Legal experts have warned that the recent High Court ruling barring former Cabinet minister Saviour Kasukuwere from contesting in the August 23 polls could have far-reaching implications for Zimbabweans in the diaspora who wish to participate in the upcoming elections.
The High Court disqualified Kasukuwere, who is in self-exile in South Africa, from contesting the presidential race, ruling that he did not meet the criteria to contest because he has not been a resident in Zimbabwe for the past 18 months. A ZANU PF activist challenged the former Cabinet minister’s candidature and the High Court judge ruled that Kasukuwere should not be included on the ballot paper.
Legal experts noted that the ruling could disenfranchise millions of Zimbabweans in the diaspora. They stated that the right to vote is a constitutional right, and no one should take it away. Dumisani Dube said:
That could be the implication of that interpretation. It can deny others a chance to vote, remember it has been challenged and most of our people in the diaspora will likely fail to participate in the election which is contrary to what the Constitution says.
Remember, a right to vote is a constitutional right and no one should take it away. I don’t agree with what that judge said, as it can be used to deny others the right to vote.
Lawyer Alec Muchadehama said the High Court failed to prove that Kasukuwere’s name was not on the voters’ roll. He said:
I do not agree with the High Court’s judgment since it failed to prove that Kasukuwere’s name was not on the voters roll and Kasukuwere’s judgment is irrelevant.
Well, other citizens may not be affected as this provision specifically targeted those who want to contest for the presidency. As long as ordinary citizens are on the voters roll, they can come and vote.
Posting on Twitter, journalist and activist Hopewell Chin’ono said the ruling was a blow to the rights of Zimbabweans in the diaspora. He said:
Zimbabweans in South Africa and beyond, who have not been in Zimbabwe for more than 18 months, can be potentially stopped from voting if this judgment is taken to its logical conclusion.
Political actors should treat this judgment seriously. It doesn’t affect Kasukuwere only. It is a dangerous judgment, but people are quiet.
Election Resource Centre legal and advocacy officer Takunda Tsunga said registered citizens who were living abroad could participate in the electoral process if they were registered and appeared on the voters’ roll. Tsunga said:
The complexity in the judgment is that while the court deemed that Kasukuwere has not been resident in Zimbabwe for a period exceeding 18 months, there have been no indications from the (Zimbabwe) Electoral Commission that his name has been removed from the voters roll.
The commission is the only body legally mandated to remove names from the voters roll. There are procedures involved when removing names from the voters roll, which include the publication of the intention to remove names from the voters roll, following an investigation by the commission on the alleged absence of a person for a continuous period exceeding 18 months.
Therefore, for registered Zimbabweans living abroad, they are still entitled to vote as there have not been any removals for absence.
Zimbabwe Election Advocacy Trust executive director Ignatious Sadziwa said the law did not necessarily affect the voter.
Inasmuch as section 23 of the electoral law prohibits candidates who have resided outside the country for 18 months, the law doesn’t necessarily affect the voter as long as they are not displaced from the delimitation exercise they can still participate.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is set to hear Kasukuwere’s appeal tomorrow.
Kasukuwere has been in self-imposed exile since 2017 when he fled the country following the ouster of the late former president Robert Mugabe.