Trustworth Quality Bales 👚👖👗👕

Trustworth Quality Bales 👚👖👗👕

Basa redu tinohodhesa mabhero, mabhero emhando yepamusoro nemutengo wakanaka. We have a good reputation and customer yatatanga kudealer nayo todealer in the long run because of customer loyalty. +263783405393

Open
HomeTechnology

Australia Approves Social Media Ban For Children Under 16

4 months agoFri, 29 Nov 2024 15:22:34 GMT
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedIn
Australia Approves Social Media Ban For Children Under 16

Australia will ban children under the age of 16 from using social media, following the approval of the world’s strictest laws on the issue, reported BBC News.

Tech companies that fail to enforce the ban could face fines of up to A$50 million ($32.5 million; £25.7 million).

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said that the legislation is necessary to protect young people from the harms associated with social media, a sentiment echoed by many parent groups.

Critics have raised concerns about the practicality of the ban, questioning how it will be enforced and its potential effects on privacy and social connections for young people.

While other countries have attempted to restrict children’s social media use, Australia’s minimum age of 16 is the highest globally. This law does not include exemptions for existing users or those with parental consent.

Click here: Pindula WhatsApp Channel
wa.me/channel/0029Vb4GVea90x2nCSDImS1b

 

The bill passed the Senate by a vote of 34 to 19 on Thursday night, then returned to the House of Representatives, where it passed early on Friday.

The legislation does not specify which platforms will be banned. These decisions will be made later by Australia’s Communications Minister, Michelle Rowland, who will consult the eSafety Commissioner.

Rowland has indicated that major platforms like Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and X will be included in the ban.

However, gaming and messaging platforms, along with sites accessible without an account (like YouTube), will be exempt.

The government plans to implement age-verification technology to enforce the ban. Social media platforms will be responsible for integrating these measures, with testing scheduled in the coming months.

Digital researchers have raised concerns about the effectiveness of the age-verification technology, which could include biometrics or identity information, and its potential impact on privacy.

Critics warn that children could bypass the ban using tools like VPNs, which allow users to mask their location and access platforms as though they are from a different country.

Children who circumvent the ban will not face penalties.

Limited polling suggests that the majority of Australian parents and caregivers support the proposed reforms.

Many experts argue that the social media ban is too broad and could push children into less regulated areas of the internet, potentially increasing risks.

During a brief consultation period, tech companies like Google, Snap, and Meta criticized the legislation for lacking detail, with Meta calling it “ineffective” in achieving its goal of improving child safety.

TikTok also raised concerns about the bill’s vague definition of a social media platform, suggesting it could apply to nearly all online services.

X questioned the law’s compatibility with international regulations and human rights treaties.

Youth advocates also accused the government of misunderstanding social media’s role in young people’s lives and excluding them from the discussion.

In 2023, France introduced a law blocking social media access for children under 15 without parental consent. However, research shows that nearly half of users managed to bypass the ban using a VPN.

Norway has pledged to follow Australia’s example in implementing similar restrictions.

The UK’s technology secretary said that a similar ban is “on the table,” though he clarified that it is not a current priority.

More: Pindula News

Tags

10 Comments

🔞🇿🇼 · 4 months ago
rovedzai vana ava kunzira dzakanaka chete...
Oncemore · 4 months ago
Isn't that too late, good idea but some NGOS will protest the move especially here in Zimbabwe. They say children have rights to social media, because they are also humans. I have seen a number of young boys wearing earrings, earrings are meant for women, they make ladies look beautiful. Why do young men wear them. It's social media
Mortician · 4 months ago
where is it written earrings are for women. I'm from Mocambique, Sena tribe. it's our culture kuboorwa nzeve toisa tsanga. Bamudiki makurisa zvisinga fani kukura. Taurai kwamaswera
🥒👌🌅🌭 · 4 months ago
Sena tribe inonzi chii kuno kuzim
Optimus · 4 months ago
In my view, the real cure is to leave the care of children with parents. Not government and especially not human rights NGOs.
Mhanduwe · 4 months ago
chakabaya chikatyokera
Optimus · 4 months ago
Everytime the government tries to enforce protection by law it manages to create more criminals than solving the issue. They should leave parents to enforce these things. Educate parents in tools to protect their children. Case in point, in every country they imposed the ban children used VPNs, why because the government cannot monitor the children without violating privacy, they should have empowered parents by giving them necessary software and education to use online because they can enforce it.
Ediots · 4 months ago
there is no qay to enforce the Ban even for such a tech advanced nation. so its just an academic legal instrument and nothing else. Zim will try to copy but haibo it will not work. censorship will never work
Sean De Hi · 4 months ago
we also need tha ban in Zim zvimwe police ingawan basa ravo chairo varitadz
𝙎𝙞𝙮𝙤𝙮𝙤 · 4 months ago
muchanzwa team Zimbabwe manje manje will copy havadi kusarira

Leave a Comment


Generate a Whatsapp Message

Buy Phones on Credit.

More Deals
Feedback