"Rhodesians Invested In Rhodesia, Zimbabweans Are Investing In Other Countries"

Political commentator Jacob Kudzayi Mutisi has joined the debate on social media platforms about the contrasting legacies of the Rhodesian and Zimbabwean governments.

Mutisi said that while both administrations faced unique challenges, a key point of comparison is their investment strategies and commitment to national development. He said:

The Rhodesian government, despite its controversial history, notably prioritised the development of its domestic institutions like healthcare, schools, vocational institutions, universities, financial institutions, industries, etc creating a robust foundation that contributed to its successes…

One of the most significant aspects of the Rhodesian government was its investment in local infrastructure, particularly in education and healthcare.

Rhodesia had some of the best medical institutions and educational facilities in the world, developed to serve its population.

Buy Samsung, itel, Redmi smartphones in Zimbabwe

WhatsApp: +263715068543

Schools and universities were established to cater to local needs, ensuring that students received quality education that prepared them for careers in various industries.

This focus on local investment created a skilled workforce and fostered a sense of community ownership over public services. Recruiting the best abroad and bringing them to serve in Zimbabwe.

Mutisi pointed out that, in contrast, many Zimbabwean leaders prioritise sending their children abroad for education and healthcare, raising concerns about the long-term implications for the country. He added:

By opting for foreign institutions, these leaders inadvertently signal a lack of faith in the local systems that their government oversees.

This practice undermines the potential for Zimbabwe to develop its own world-class institutions, as it perpetuates a cycle of underinvestment in local infrastructure.

The idea that Zimbabwean leaders should be required to utilise local services, whether for education or healthcare, could serve as a catalyst for change.

If leaders were mandated to have their families educated and treated in Zimbabwe’s government institutions, it would create a direct incentive for improving the quality of these services.

Such a policy could lead to increased investments in schools, vocational institutions, universities and hospitals, as leaders would have a vested interest in ensuring these institutions meet high standards.

Moreover, this shift could foster a renewed sense of national pride and responsibility among Zimbabwean citizens.

When leaders demonstrate their commitment to local services, it encourages the public to invest in their communities.

A collective effort to enhance the quality of education and healthcare could eventually elevate Zimbabwe to the standards once seen in Rhodesia.

More: Pindula News