@Chigananda, i think you are a bit confused so better dont question the credibility of where Ncube learnt the law. There is nothing wrong with him seeking enforcement of the prior High Court judgement, considering the fact that the Supreme Court has not yet handed down a binding judgement. It is 100% possible to approach a court seeking an enforcement order for the judgement it gave, in the mean time before the appeal is finalized. In this case, The core of the relief sought by Ncube is an interdict order, interdicting Tshabangu to continue carrying on reshuffles, thus enforcing the previous judgement by the High Court. So it is in my view that i concur with Ncube's counsels, procedurally they are right although unfortunately Justice Wamambo dismissed their case. I am yet to read his written judgement inorder to take note of the ratio dicidendi but what um sure of is that technically, there is nothing wrong with what Ncube did. Your point was valid if and only if Ncube was seeking this order from the High Court whilist the Supreme Court had delievered a different judgement on the appeal. If that was the case then you was right. the desicion by the Supreme Court was now the binding one and the functus officio as such a court of lower jurisdiction (High Court) can not at law reverse that judgement. However, this case is different in that the Supreme Court has not yet handed down a judgement as such Ncube can rightfully approach the High Court seeking enforcement of its judgement in the meantime