Ndavaningi “Nick” Mangwana, the Permanent Secretary for Information, Publicity, and Broadcasting Services, has said the government should regulate churches due to the rise of religious scams disguised as Christianity.
Mangwana, who has openly declared that he is not religious, argued that while religion is intended to provide comfort, guidance, and a sense of community, some churches in Zimbabwe have strayed from these noble principles. He said:
<blockquote>
[Churches] have become breeding grounds for political pronouncements aimed at causing instability, child marriages, sexual deviance, financial abuse, and cultist behaviour.
The recent events at Madzibaba Ishmael’s farm, where cultist behaviour was on full display, are a stark reminder of the dangers of unregulated religious practices.
The sight of individuals being coerced into parting with their hard-earned cash, or worse still, their children, is a clear indication that something is amiss.
It is alarming to note that anyone can simply wake up one morning, find a rock in the bush, declare it a shrine, plant a banner, and voilà! A new church is born.
</blockquote>
Mangwana asserted that there is a lack of accountability and oversight in the establishment of churches in Zimbabwe, creating an environment where charlatans and con artists can pose as men and women of God, exploiting the vulnerable and gullible. He said:
<blockquote>
It is imperative that we take a closer look at the regulation of churches in Zimbabwe.
We cannot continue to allow religion to be used as a cloak for nefarious activities.
The time has come for us to demand greater accountability and transparency from our religious leaders.
</blockquote>
Mangwana further argued that regulating churches, especially the new evangelical, apostolic, and Pentecostal movements, is essential to ensure transparency and accountability. He said:
<blockquote>
These churches often have a charismatic leader who is revered as a spiritual authority, and sometimes even as a demi-god. 
This can create a power dynamic where the leader has absolute control over the church’s finances, operations, and members.
Often this comes with some nepotistic succession plan, where gifts and callings are sexually transmitted. Husband professes the gift of prophecy and presto, wife is now a prophetess!
The whole financial matrix becomes opaque and nobody but those belonging to this family will be anywhere near the purse strings.
Without regulation, it can be challenging to track the flow of funds, identify potential financial mismanagement, and protect members from exploitation.
</blockquote>
Mangwana suggested that to regulate churches effectively, the government needs to create a clear framework that addresses the specific characteristics of new evangelical, Mapostori, and Pentecostal movements. 
This could include requirements like financial transparency, such as submitting audited accounts and detailed budgets.
He also proposed that the government establish guidelines for church governance, including the creation of independent boards or oversight committees to prevent the church from being controlled solely by its founder or leader.
Mangwana pointed out that in countries like South Africa, Kenya, the UK, and Australia, churches are regulated. 
For example, in South Africa, churches must register with the National Register of Non-Profit Organisations, submitting financial statements, constitutions, and other documents. Registered churches must also follow accounting and auditing standards.
In Zimbabwe, Mangwana recommended that churches register with relevant authorities, such as the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA) and the Ministry of Public Service, Labour and Social Welfare, as a step toward improving transparency and accountability.
 Churches should be required to submit their constitutions, financial reports, lists of office bearers, and governance systems. 
He also posited that leaders should undergo vetting to ensure they have no history of financial misconduct or sexual offences, arguing that such people should not be allowed near the pulpit.
More: <a href="https://www.herald.co.zw/time-to-rein-in-religious-scams/">The Herald</a>

Pindula News

Nick Mangwana, a government official in Zimbabwe, wants to regulate churches because some are doing bad things under the guise of religion. He believes some churches are causing harm by doing political things, sexual abuse, and taking advantage of people. Mangwana thinks it's important to make sure churches are accountable for their actions and are transparent with their money. He wants to create rules that churches must follow, like submitting financial reports and having independent oversight. Mangwana believes this will protect people from being exploited by fake religious leaders. He thinks other countries like South Africa and the UK already regulate churches, so Zimbabwe should do the same.

Nick Mangwana Calls For Regulation Of Churches In Zimbabwe

Former CCC leader Nelson Chamisa expressed his deep concern over Zimbabwe’s crippling brain drain, which has seen the country lose its brightest minds to foreign economies over the past two decades.
In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Chamisa revealed that he receives daily calls from professionals who are planning to leave Zimbabwe in search of better opportunities, a trend that has serious implications for the country’s economic development. He wrote:
<blockquote>
Just this morning, I received four different calls from some professionals, all planning on leaving the country to seek opportunities in other countries.
My daily agony is waking up every day to the lived nightmare of receiving yet another call from a fellow Zimbabwean desperate to leave the country searching for what is believed to be greener pastures. This is a story I have experienced repeatedly for the past 20 years.
Often, these calls are not just conversations they are pleas for assistance and requests for guidance on finding a way to exit and escape to a perceived better life and future.
The sheer scale of brain drain we are experiencing is staggering. As a nation, we are hemorrhaging talent and gifts losing the very citizens we have invested in and educated (with meager resources for that matter) to other economies, where they go to build and strengthen economies elsewhere.
</blockquote>
According to Chamisa, it is nothing short of devastating that Zimbabwe has consistently haemorrhaged its most precious and strategic resource: its talented, skilled, and highly-educated young professionals. He added:
<blockquote>
This is plainly heartbreaking. Leadership is the missing link. Those in leadership have let the people down. By leadership, I mean everyone within the ecosystem of governance and influence. Any serious leadership would not allow this hemorrhaging to continue untamed or unchecked.
We cannot continue with a situation where all of us, as a people, are perennially preoccupied with finding a way out of our own country. I am yet to see a nation that thrives when the bulk of its best minds are outside it. It can’t!
It has become a common disposition for citizens to go seeking opportunities in other countries. The motivation being that the grass is greener elsewhere.
Granted, the grass always seems greener elsewhere, but it should be greenest wherever we are. Yet, right now, that green grass is benefitting no one here—except a select few.
</blockquote>
The former opposition leader urged Zimbabweans to come together to revamp the country’s economy, creating an environment that fosters growth, opportunity, and innovation, and put an end to the crippling brain drain that has plagued the nation.

Nelson Chamisa is worried about the brain drain in Zimbabwe. Many smart people are leaving the country for better opportunities in other places. Chamisa gets calls from professionals who want to leave Zimbabwe every day. He thinks it's sad that the country is losing its talented and educated people. Chamisa says the leaders in Zimbabwe need to do something to stop this brain drain. He wants everyone in the country to work together to improve the economy and give people a reason to stay in Zimbabwe.

Chamisa: The Scale Of Brain Drain Zimbabwe Is Experiencing Is Staggering

UK-based Zimbabwean lawyer and political commentator Brighton Mutebuka has reported sources as saying the ZANU PF politburo has approved a proposal by some party members to amend Zimbabwe’s Constitution to extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term. Below is Mutebuka’s post on X:
<blockquote>
<h2>*Exclusive* The ZANU PF Politburo Reportedly Okays Constitutional Amendment To Extend ED’s Term!</h2>
Highly placed sources from ZANU PF‘s politburo stated that the party gave the greenlight for Zimbabwe’s Constitution to be amended to extend ED‘s presidential term. The meeting was described as having been highly charged or tense.
It was apparently the first time that the subject had been broached before the Soviet style Politburo. Before this, the matter was reportedly sketched out via choreographed pro-ED public rallies to railroad the party structures into adopting the resolution before a party head feigning disinterest &amp; ignorance of the subject.
During the heated meeting, some reportedly argued that the amendment was unConstitutional. ED was reported to have pretended to be typically uninterested before suddenly &amp; decisively intervening to emphasise the fact that there was a binding resolution – at the most opportune time, to bat away the claim of unconstitutionality.
Chiwenga was reported to have remained totally silent during the proceedings, a development which apparently baffled many – including some on his side.
Oppah Muchinguri reportedly took the task of ED‘s fierce chief enforcer. She reportedly complained that some, (apparently referring to Chiwenga indirectly), barely said anything during party meetings but were quick to stir trouble out of it via opposing binding party resolutions!
The above then paved the way for Geza &amp; other ZANU PF party leaders to be expelled on the premises explained by Patrick Chinamasa in the video below. In typical ZANU PF fashion, the whole show appeared to have been scripted to flush out Chiwenga‘s backers, prod Chiwenga into the open to expose him, and then expel his vocal backers in the party.
As things stand, relying on the binding 2030 resolution, it is now theoretically / technically possible for Chiwenga to be expelled for “disloyalty” if he repeatedly and demonstrably fails to publicly back the resolution.
This strategy forms part of the “warning” ED gave during his address against those who failed to respect the party &amp; its strictures. Whether or not ED will go for the “jugular” in that fashion remains to be seen, as such a monumental chessboard move is fraught with a great many risks which he will need to put contingent measures for before executing it.
A few weeks ago, many, including yours truly – wrongly speculated that perhaps the military had self-deployed tanks in Harare and other areas in scenes akin to November 2017.
Several highly placed sources suggested that it was actually ED himself who did this as a pre-emptive gesture to Chiwenga – to show that he could still command the military – perhaps via Sibanda.
If the sources are correct, it means that ED is progressively filibustering the whole body politic and strangling Chiwenga – in ZANU PF and in state institutions, including in terrain which had been thought to be favourable to Chiwenga, like the military.
This means that the path to a favourable outcome for Chiwenga is dramatically narrowing, and he would have to come out with a spectacular, Houdini like manoeuvre to escape the stranglehold within the current political window left.
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
Zimbabwe is now inexorably marching towards either an ED life presidency or a dynasty, depending on who you ask, barring the unexpected. If the intel shared from the sources is accurate, as is highly likely, in the next few weeks or months, we should start seeing “movements” from Ziyambi Ziyambi and the captured Parliament to kickstart the Constitutional framework to enforce ED‘s tilt at a life presidency which I exclusively disclosed here 2 years ago to many disbelieving folks!
Remember, you read it here first. If there are further twists &amp; turns, I will provide updates. If time permits, there will be further in-depth analysis over the weekend.
The biggest take away is Chiwenga‘s reported silence during probably one of the most significant Politburo meetings in ZANU PF &amp; Zimbabwe‘s history! Did he “choke?” Was he intimidated? Had be been “tipped” ahead of the meeting – perhaps that it was trap to see if he would foolishly back Geza &amp; crew and be accused of being their Godfather? It is part of an elaborate strategy – a long game – smoke &amp; mirrors version of his own? At this point, we simply do not know!
Whatever we all think, it was a huge victory for ED – for now. He has effectively managed to get “elected” as a life President by ZANU PF without ever publicly claiming to want the position.
By the very same act, it is now illegal in ZANU PF to go against the 2030 resolution, so Chiwenga is now no longer able to publicly oppose the resolution without risking being subjected to disciplinary action.
In terms of the military, CDF Phillip Valerio Sibanda is above Sanyatwe in terms of protocol and is in ED’s corner, the War Veterans are currently divided after ED unleashed Douglas Mahiya &amp; Tungwarara on them – so the situation is at best murky for Chiwenga &amp; his team. He would have to find ingenious / create ways to dismantle that coalition &amp; steal a march on ED.
</blockquote>

Zimbabwe's ruling party, ZANU PF, has approved a change to the Constitution to extend President Mnangagwa's term. During a heated meeting, some argued it was unconstitutional but Mnangagwa intervened. Vice President Chiwenga remained silent, causing confusion. Mnangagwa's supporters expelled some party leaders. This move could lead to Mnangagwa becoming president for life. The military may also be on Mnangagwa's side. Chiwenga's options are limited, and he may need to make a big move to challenge Mnangagwa. The situation is tense, with uncertain outcomes for both sides.

ZANU PF Politburo Okays Constitutional Amendment To Extend Mnangagwa's Term, Says Mutebuka

A political activist has dismissed President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s recent declaration that he will retire at the end of his second term in 2028, arguing that it should not be taken seriously.
During an interactive meeting with selected editors from both public and private media at State House on Monday, 17 February, Mnangagwa said he would not be persuaded to remain in power beyond 2028.
However, in a Facebook post, Hon. Learnmore K Magorimbo, president of the Zimbabwe Youth Alliance (ZYA), suggested that Mnangagwa’s statement was merely a tactic to buy time and not a reflection of the actual situation. Wrote Magorimbo:
<blockquote>
Today, in a carefully staged meeting at State House, Mnangagwa once again played the role of a constitutionalist, claiming that he will operate “within the confines of the constitution” and that he has no intention of clinging to power. But history has shown that when Mnangagwa speaks of legality, he is only justifying his next move.
This is the same man who promised economic reform, democracy, and an end to corruption—yet all Zimbabweans have seen is worsening poverty, political repression, and a looting frenzy by his inner circle. His words are never a reflection of reality but a tool to buy time.
</blockquote>
Magorimbo warned Mnangagwa’s opponents that the ZANU PF leader needs more time, not to transition power, but to further consolidate it. He said:
<blockquote>
If he were truly sincere about stepping down, he would do so now. But his real intention is clear—he needs more time, not to transition power, but to consolidate it.
He is not preparing for retirement; he is restrategizing. His past actions speak louder than today’s empty words.
</blockquote>
The ZYA leader argued that Mnangagwa’s assurances were not genuine signs of good faith, but rather a calculated move to ease pressure and adjust his strategy.
He further warned that the longer Mnangagwa remains in power, the more ruthless his tactics are likely to become. Said Magorimbo:
<blockquote>
His grip on the state is not about leadership—it is about securing a life presidency by any means necessary.
Believing his promises now is not just naïve; it is a direct betrayal of history. Mnangagwa has no intention of stepping down willingly.
He is simply playing for time, ensuring that when he makes his final move, there will be no one left to challenge him.
</blockquote>

President Emmerson Mnangagwa said he will retire in 2028, but a political activist doesn't believe him. The activist thinks it's just a trick to buy more time and stay in power longer. The activist warned that Mnangagwa is not planning to retire, but to make his power stronger. The activist said people shouldn't trust Mnangagwa's promises because he wants to be president for life. Mnangagwa's words might sound good, but his actions show he wants to stay in power.

"Mnangagwa's Promise To Retire In 2028 A Tactic To Buy Time And Adjust His Strategy"

Social media personality Mmatigari has again criticized Wicknell Chivayo for recklessly throwing around US dollars and flying with a group of “mapostori” in chartered jets, calling it a mockery of hardworking Zimbabweans who cannot identify any legitimate business he operates that benefits the public.
In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Mmatigari said that if Strive Masiyiwa, John Moxon, or other business figures engaged in similar displays of wealth, people would not begrudge them, as they at least know the source of their money, despite potential disapproval of their business practices.
Masiyiwa is the founder and chairman of Econet Global, a leading telecommunications company with operations in multiple countries, while Moxon has a major stake in Meikles Limited. The group includes renowned brands like Victoria Falls Hotel, TM Supermarkets, Meikles Stores, Meikles Centar Mining, and Tanganda Tea Company.
Mmatigari suggested that if Chivayo were engaging in such antics in countries like China, he would have faced severe consequences. Wrote Mmatigari:
<blockquote>
If Strive Masiyiwa, or John Moxon, or other business people threw US dollars around recklessly, or flew around with a bunch of mapostori in chartered jets, people will not begrudge them at all.
They may disapprove of their business tactics like pricing and data usage, but they at least know where the money is coming from.
Even Chiyangwa, you may think he is devious, but you can go to his properties he build. It’s tangible.
Chivhayo’s blatant antics fly in the face of honest hardworking Zimbabweans who cannot point to any business he runs that serves the people.
The nation has spent the last several weeks plugging smuggling along the our borders, making sure people pay duty and taxes. There is even a ministerial committee making sure the government collects money.
It’s a severe source of national disaffection if there are some devious characters with no known businesses throwing around hard currency like confetti in the face of so much hardship. In China, Xi Jinping would have waved his sjambok of discipline.
</blockquote>
Over the past several months, Chivayo has given away cars to several public figures including musicians and retired football players.

A person named Mmatigari is angry at Wicknell Chivayo for spending a lot of money and showing off his wealth. They say it's not fair to hardworking Zimbabweans who don't know where Chivayo's money comes from. They compare him to other rich people who have successful businesses. Mmatigari thinks Chivayo would get in trouble in other countries for his behavior. Chivayo has also been giving away cars to famous people. People are upset because they don't see how his spending benefits anyone.

"Chivayo's Wasteful Spending And Lavish Lifestyle An Insult To Hardworking Zimbabweans"

Social media personality Mmatigari has expressed frustration over ZANU PF’s focus on extending President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term in office, rather than addressing pressing economic challenges such as company closures and double-digit inflation.
A ZANU PF sympathizer, Mmatigari warned that neglecting the country’s economic issues poses a potential national security threat.
In a post on X, Mmatigari also criticized the reckless display of wealth and cash by Wicknell Chivhayo, a businessman with no known operational ventures, calling it a security threat. He wrote:
<blockquote>
The lack of focus on the all important issue of the economy while people are engrossed in extending the President’s term when he still has 3 &amp; half years to go is a potential national security threat.
ALSO, the reckless and grotesque display of wealth and throwing around of cash by Wicknell Chivhayo who has no known operating business anywhere and had a brother arrested in South Africa peddling smuggled gold is a SECURITY THREAT. It’s a security problem at a time the government is squeezing taxes from anyone and everyone to make ends meet.
Does anyone know of anyone who has bought anything from any business run by Wicknell?
These issues give rise to the Geza situation, descriptions like zvigananda and general disaffection in society. We must at all times hold dear the societal values that make us Zimbabwean. We are not from Hollywood.
We descend from forefathers who coveted societal harmony, equitable access to the wealth of the land, and masters of building cities whose remains stand to this day. These values must be kept and cherished by all.
</blockquote>

Mmatigari is unhappy that ZANU PF is focusing on extending the President's term instead of fixing economic problems like inflation and business closures. Neglecting the economy could be a danger to national security. Mmatigari also criticizes businessman Chivhayo for flaunting his wealth and cash without any known business ventures, calling it a security threat. It's a problem when the government is struggling financially but people like Chivhayo are showing off their money. It's important to remember Zimbabwean values of harmony and sharing wealth, not Hollywood-style extravagance.

"Chivayo's Reckless Display Of Wealth And Cash A Security Threat"

By Corban Madzivanyika
The proposed sale of state-owned enterprises to settle Zimbabwe’s massive national debt is a short-sighted solution that will have far-reaching and devastating consequences for the country’s economy and its people.
Privatizing strategic assets will not only lead to job losses and economic instability but also compromise Zimbabwe’s sovereignty and self-determination. 
State-owned enterprises play a critical role in driving economic growth, providing essential services, and promoting social welfare.
Moreover, the sale of these enterprises will likely benefit foreign investors and wealthy criminal elements (Zvigananda) such as Wicknel Chivharo, Kuda Tagwirei etc at the expense of ordinary Zimbabweans.
Zvigananda will buy those Assets at far below the market prices for self-enrichment. This proposed sale is a blatant perpetuation of the looting scheme by Emmerson and his cronies.
It is unacceptable to sacrifice the country’s long-term interests and assets to appease foreign creditors and investors.
It is a source of serious worry to note that the bulk of the US 21 billion debt was not properly validated in that, a big portion relates to non-performing loans and Gvt guarantees extended to private individuals and companies who choose deliberately not to pay back under Command Agriculture and many other schemes. So to sell national assets to pay for such gross negligence is outrageous and is in defiance of logic.
Zimbabwe is well endowed with vast mineral resources which only requires an accountable government to pay off the 21 billion debt.
The only problem is a leadership which is not genuinely interested in serving Zimbabwe first but advance the embezzlement of national resources for their immediate families.
Zimbabwe mines produce around 1.6 tonnes of Gold per day across the country, but it has a huge debt overhang only as a result of the illicit exportation of the precious minerals promoted and protected by senior government politicians.
President Mnangagwa squandered the opportunity for debt restructuring through the Structural dialogue platform with International creditors as facilitated by the African Development Bank.
The government has failed to implement comprehensive reforms, including electoral, social, economic, and political reforms, necessary for sustainable debt resolution.
To make matters worse, ED perpetuates the broken social contract expressed in the government’s disregard for the Constitution, human rights, and the rule of law has eroded trust and confidence among international creditors and citizens.
Instead, he was on an overdrive in human rights violations and Illegal detentions eg cases of Hon Jameson Timba and others, Hon Amos Chibaya and others, Job Sikhala, Namatai Kwekweza and others just to mention a few.
After realising that he lost the parliamentary majority, he teamed up with Sengezo Tshabangu to recall the legitimate CCC MPs in order to get a two-thirds majority by hook and crook.
All this makes International financial creditors feel insecure about lodging any further deals or debt restructuring with such a dishonest and crooked leader.
The real solution to our debt crisis is political. It is the bad politics that is hampering progress because it is tolerating the culture of corruption, nepotism, and Lawlessness.
By adopting a more sustainable and equitable approach, Zimbabwe can address its debt challenges while protecting the interests of its people and preserving its sovereignty.
Corban Madzivanyika is the Member of Parliament for Mbizo (CCC) and Shadow Finance Minister.

Zimbabwe wants to sell state-owned businesses to pay a big debt, but it's not a good idea. It will hurt the economy and people. The country needs these businesses for growth and helping people. Selling them will mostly benefit rich foreigners and criminals, not regular Zimbabweans. The debt came from bad loans and government guarantees to private people who don't pay back. The leader, President Mnangagwa, hasn't fixed the problem. There is a lot of corruption and bad politics in Zimbabwe. To solve the debt problem, Zimbabwe needs to change its leadership and stop corruption.

Sale Of State Owned Enterprises Assets To Pay National Debt A Deadly Own Goal

Zimbabwean opposition politician Job Sikhala has called for the disbanding of the Southern African Development Community (SADC), arguing that the organisation has failed to address the region’s challenges.
Sikhala contends that instead of providing solutions for conflicts and disputed elections, SADC has “become a liability” and a platform for authoritarian leaders to assert their dominance. He said:
<blockquote>
I totally agree with those who are arguing that SADC must be disbanded for its ineffective and moribund status.
SADC has not only become a liability to its citizens but has become an albatross on the neck of the people in the region.
It is now a platform used for grandstanding by clueless and cruel despots whose appetite for power and recognition is embarrassing. 
</blockquote>
Sikhala called for the disbandment of SADC and the formation of a new regional bloc focused on promoting democracy, and good governance, protecting citizens’ security, combating corruption, and addressing other critical issues. He said:
<blockquote>
The region needs a people’s regional bloc governed through promoting democracy, good governance, protecting the security of its citizens, curtailment of siphoning of stolen funds into its banking systems and free trade markets.
We are currently having a cocktail of regimes promoting the murder of its citizens for the sake of retaining power right on their faces grinning. SADC must be disbanded immediately!
</blockquote>
SADC is currently struggling with ongoing conflicts in member states, namely Mozambique and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
In Mozambique, the SADC Mission in Mozambique (SAMIM) was deployed to combat the jihadist insurgency in the Cabo Delgado province, but its efforts have seen limited success.
The mission has faced challenges, including insufficient cooperation between SADC and Mozambican forces, as well as the controversial involvement of Rwandan troops, which has complicated the operation.
In the DRC, SADC’s Southern African Development Community Mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo (SAMIDRC) was deployed to address the resurgence of armed groups in the eastern part of the country.
However, violence has escalated, leading to widespread displacement caused by groups like the M23 rebels, as well as the tragic loss of peacekeepers’ lives, including 13 South African soldiers.

Job Sikhala, a Zimbabwean opposition politician, wants to get rid of SADC because it hasn't helped with conflicts and bad elections in the region. He thinks SADC just lets bad leaders show off and hurt people. He wants a new group that will focus on democracy, protecting citizens, stopping corruption, and fixing other important problems. SADC is having trouble dealing with conflicts in Mozambique and the DRC, and the missions there are not doing very well. There are issues with cooperation and foreign troops getting involved. Violence is getting worse, and even soldiers are dying. Sikhala thinks SADC should be disbanded and replaced with a better organization.

Sikhala: SADC Has Failed The Region, Should Be Disbanded

Opposition politician Fadzayi Mahere has sharply criticized the “ED2030” agenda, which refers to the push by President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s supporters to extend his rule beyond the constitutional two-term limit, that is, from 2028, when his second and final term ends, to 2030.
In recent days, some of the ED2030 proponents have gone even further, suggesting that Mnangagwa’s rule should be extended to 2033, effectively giving him a third term in office.
Responding to Information Minister Jenfan Muswere’s statement, Mahere dismissed the notion as “patently nonsensical.”
She argued that the ED2030 agenda is being driven by “a small coterie of power mongers in ZANU PF who want to extend their incompetent, corrupt rule.”
Mahere’s scathing rebuke comes in the wake of ZANU PF’s efforts to extend Mnangagwa’s tenure, which the opposition leader sees as an affront to Zimbabwe’s democratic principles and the will of the people.
In a post on the social media platform X, Mahere rejected the suggestion that those who oppose any proposed extension of presidential term limits are merely acting at the behest of Western interests. She wrote:
<blockquote>
Zimbabweans are smart enough to be able to call out unconstitutional abuses of power and regressive imperial tendencies when we see them.
</blockquote>
Earlier this week, Information Minister Jenfan Muswere criticized the Zimbabwe Heads of Christian Denominations (ZHOCD) for their vocal opposition to the proposed presidential term limit extension.
Muswere claimed that the ZHOCD consists of “donor-funded individuals pretending to represent the Church in Zimbabwe.”
Responding to Muswere’s statement, Mahere asserted that the majority of Zimbabweans do not support the ED2030 agenda.
She said Zimbabweans had overwhelmingly voted in favour of the current constitution, which limits presidential terms to two.
The Zimbabwe Heads of Christian Denominations had previously warned that extending Mnangagwa’s term would amount to a “coup against the constitution.” Said Mahere:
<blockquote>
The 2013 Constitution which imposes strict term limits on the presidency was passed by a referendum by the people of Zimbabwe. The people have not said they want that to change. Indeed, we do not.
A small coterie of power mongers in Zanu PF who want to extend their incompetent, corrupt rule cannot usurp the Constitution and what the people declared as their collective will in the constitutional referendum.
This is the essence of why Zimbabweans were so opposed to Robert Mugabe – yet here you are, trying to revive his penchant for holding onto power when it is time for change.
Never in a million years, Ian Smith said. I will rule from the grave, Robert Mugabe said. Until 2030 you say.
History will tell you it never works.
</blockquote>

Opposition leader Fadzayi Mahere is upset about a plan called "ED2030" that wants to let President Mnangagwa rule until 2030 or even longer. She says it's a bad idea by corrupt people in the ZANU PF party. Many Zimbabweans agree with her and want the president to follow the current rules that only allow two terms. Religious leaders and ordinary people are against changing the rules too. They say it's like going against what the people of Zimbabwe want. Mahere thinks this plan is wrong and reminds people of the problems when leaders try to hold onto power for too long.

Mahere Decries "ED2030" Agenda As Power Grab By A Corrupt ZANU PF "Coterie"

Former Finance Minister Tendai Biti has warned of potential economic chaos in 2025 if there is no liberalised exchange rate and no injection of liquidity into the economy.
In an interview with <a href="https://www.newsday.co.zw/business/article/200036951/economy-heads-for-a-bloodbath-biti">NewsDay</a>, Biti said the introduction of the gold-backed ZiG currency in 2024 has contributed to economic instability. Said Biti:
<blockquote>
Companies are paying the price of an uncertain political regime and exchange rate mismanagement. The introduction of the ZiG [Zimbabwe Gold] currency has only brought chaos to the economy.
</blockquote>
Biti warned that Zimbabwe could face a total collapse in aggregate demand as businesses grapple with crippling debt charges and limited access to affordable capital.
To prevent further economic decline, Biti said that must be cheap money in the market to provide businesses with the funding necessary for survival.
He also criticized the export surrender requirement, calling it an unnecessary burden that restricts access to foreign currency.
Under the current system, exporters are required to surrender 25% of their proceeds in exchange for local currency at the prevailing interbank exchange rate.
Biti further called for the removal of money transfer fees, arguing that they stifle economic activity and increase the cost of doing business.
The former Finance Minister also expressed concern over the political uncertainty surrounding the potential extension of President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term beyond the constitutionally mandated two terms, which are set to end in 2028.
He warned that such political instability could further exacerbate the country’s economic challenges. Biti said:
<blockquote>
The uncertainty created by Mnangagwa’s third-term ambitions and the removal of key officials is discouraging investment and deepening the crisis. Such moves create suspicion and erode trust in governance.
</blockquote>
Biti said the political climate is prompting businesses to relocate to South Africa and other neighbouring countries, while investors remain cautious and reluctant to commit.
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Tendai Biti, a past Finance Minister, said 2025 could bring economic chaos if things don't change. Companies struggle with debt and need cheap money to survive. Biti doesn't like the gold-backed currency or the rules for exporting and transferring money. He worries about President Mnangagwa's future plans and their impact. Businesses might go to other countries and investors are unsure because of the political situation. Biti thinks change is needed to avoid a big economic collapse.

Biti Warns Of Economic Chaos In 2025

Outspoken former MP Fadzayi Mahere has denounced the “Mbinga culture” that has pervaded Zimbabwe, saying it does not represent the nation’s identity.
The term “Mbinga” in Zimbabwean slang refers to young, wealthy people who live lavish lifestyles, often flaunting their wealth through expensive cars, flashy clothes, and extravagant parties.
This term has become associated with a culture of displaying unexplained wealth, which some people view as a reflection of corruption and economic disparity in the country.
Some of the so-called mbingas are closely connected to self-styled prophets, particularly those who preach the “Prosperity Gospel.”
One of these prophets was secretly filmed bragging about laundering millions of dollars, which is a crime.
Some of the prophets associated with Mbingas fake miracles to gain followers, whom they then dupe into parting with their hard-earned money.
Posting on X (formerly Twitter), Mahere argued that the “Zimbabwean Dream,” which stands in opposition to the Mbinga culture, is about getting a good education, working hard, and making an honest living. She wrote:
<blockquote>
The Zimbabwean Dream is about getting a good education, working hard and making an honest living.
We are the society that celebrated the bright child in the village who became a teacher, the firstborn who went on to become a nurse, the A-grade student who went on to excel in med school and the entrepreneur who started a bus company.
We are the society that would seek out a decent job and come back home to thank our parents by giving them our first salary and a blanket.
We are a society that would work hard, save up to buy a car then go back home to show our parents the fruit of our hard work as we took them for a spin.
We are the society that taught children not to pick money off the floor because it is wrong to take what’s not ours.
We are a society that didn’t demand welfare from the State, undue tax breaks or even a free ride from Govt.
Instead, our demand was for a sound socio-economic ecosystem that gives us a fair opportunity to work, make a decent living that enables us to put food on the table, send kids to school and put a roof over our heads.
Mbinga culture – with all its corruption, lies and fake miracles – is not who we are.
</blockquote>
Meanwhile, some Zimbabweans see the Mbinga culture as a symbol of success and economic empowerment for those who have risen from humble beginnings.
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Former MP Fadzayi Mahere spoke out against the "Mbinga culture" in Zimbabwe, which is about young, rich people showing off their wealth. Some of these people are connected to fake prophets who deceive others for money. Mahere believes the real Zimbabwean Dream is about working hard, being honest, and not relying on handouts. While some see Mbinga culture as a sign of success, Mahere disagrees. She thinks it doesn't represent the true identity of Zimbabweans who value hard work, education, and honesty.

Mbinga Culture Does Not Represent Our Identity As Zimbabweans - Mahere

President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s official biographer, Eddie Cross, has said Chinese nationals have increasingly targeted Zimbabwe to secure raw materials for their industries, intending to eventually return to China.
According to Cross, there are now more than 85,000 Chinese nationals residing in Zimbabwe, but he said these people are not permanent migrants; rather, they all plan to return to China eventually.
In a recent <a href="https://www.eddiecross.africanherd.com/241228.html">article on his website</a>, Cross asserted that China’s move to establish a presence in Zimbabwe is driven by the need to relocate steel production away from China due to trade restrictions from the US and Europe.
He also suggested that the Chinese are looking to transfer environmentally polluting industries to Africa, seeking to capitalize on the continent’s natural resources while avoiding the environmental constraints imposed at home. He wrote:
<blockquote>
We have the best Chrome deposits in the world, 9 billion tonnes of it worth a conservative US$100 trillion.
We have enormous Lithium reserves and they are loaded with other critical minerals that are in fact worth more than the Lithium and we do not understand what that means.
We applaud them because shortly we will be exporting 5 million tonnes of lithium concentrate a year to China, worth perhaps US$4 billion in new export earnings, four times our famous tobacco crop, but missing the fact that it might contain other metals and minerals worth many times more.
A quarter of our gold output goes to China and we have no idea about how they are doing that or what is involved, but the evidence of open cast mining, large investments in milling and extracting machinery for the small-scale mining industry here which is among the most important in the world, is everywhere.
They ignore environmental regulations and leave behind a moonscape of countryside that looks like a World War 1 battlefield.
They are exploiting our finest coal reserves for their smelters and steel production, even exporting their surplus
</blockquote>
Cross said the exploitation of Zimbabwe’s raw materials by the Chinese began after the discovery of diamonds in Marange. He said:
<blockquote>
It all started when we discovered the Marange diamond fields and they joined forces with our old army generals and created a company that was eventually responsible for 80 per cent of the production of raw diamonds there.
I estimate that US$30 billion in raw diamonds has been produced between 2008 and today. At one stage we were larger than Botswana as a diamond-producing State.
The Chinese company that was involved was a tiny, rural corporation in China, owned by the Red Army. Today it is a multinational corporation with a whole bevy of top-class hotels, a private Jet and headquarters for Africa in Mozambique.
Our old Army Generals all benefitted greatly, just look at the homes many of them have built in this country, the physical evidence of Chinese-owned real estate in Harare is everywhere.
The people of Marange still wallow in poverty and the active diamond fields do not have a single kilometre of the tarred road although they have an international standard airport which can receive large aircraft to fly products out and bring people and equipment in…
What concerns me, is that none of this activity has any application to the needs of Zimbabwe. When I investigated the Marange diamond fields in 2012, as a Member of Parliament, I was able, with relative ease, to get the production information I needed for 5 of the 6 mining companies involved.
Why, because they all employed Zimbabweans and I got daily output figures and even quality data (19 per cent Gemstone quality) and even sales data. The last remaining miner was Chinese owned and operated and they employed no Zimbabwean staff.
</blockquote>
Cross argued that while Zimbabwe gains some benefit from exporting raw materials to China, the Chinese derive far greater advantages, all while causing significant environmental degradation. He said:
<blockquote>
The benefit to Zimbabwe of this level of Chinese activity here is evident. They buy the majority of our tobacco, our ferrochrome exports run to tens of millions of dollars a year.
Drive past Hwange Colliery, owned notionally by the Government but in fact now largely a Chinese asset. The smokestacks of coke batteries belching into the atmosphere.
The queues of heavy-duty trucks carrying coal to local and regional markets. The road north and south now smashed and barely usable.
There is little or no value addition except for the primary production phase. There are no plans to invest in a Lithium refinery to produce a product suitable for use in the production of batteries.
Even the steel plant is only producing steel billets for export to China for conversion into finished products.
International sanctions may force them to produce steel for sale to manufacturers in the West but for the time being they are producing a product for export in primary form.
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Chinese nationals are coming to Zimbabwe to use the country's resources for their own benefit. They plan to return to China eventually. China wants to move dirty industries to Africa to avoid environmental rules in their own country. They are taking valuable resources like gold, lithium, and coal. The Chinese are making a lot of money from Zimbabwe's resources, but Zimbabwe is not benefiting much. They are causing environmental damage and not adding any value to the resources. The Chinese are making products from the raw materials in Zimbabwe and then selling them back to the world. This is not helping Zimbabwe's economy.

Chinese Investments In Zimbabwe Yield Minimal Benefits For The Country - Eddie Cross

A heated debate has unfolded on X (formerly Twitter) among Zimbabweans, as many have drawn comparisons between the government of President Emmerson Mnangagwa and the infamous Ian Smith-led Rhodesian regime.
Some argue that despite Rhodesia’s deeply entrenched white supremacy, the Ian Smith administration was more efficient and less corrupt than the current ZANU PF-led government.
These critics point out that, even under international sanctions following Rhodesia’s illegal declaration of independence, Smith’s regime invested heavily in infrastructure, leaving behind well-developed roads, hospitals, and schools.
In contrast, they claim that much of this infrastructure has deteriorated under the so-called “New Dispensation.”
However, there are strong voices on the other side, staunchly opposing any romanticization of Rhodesia. 
ZANU PF chief whip and Gutu South MP, Pupurai Togarepi, has even called for legislation to criminalise celebrations of Rhodesia.
Amidst the controversy, former CCC MP Fadzayi Mahere, known for her progressive views, has refrained from directly engaging in the debate.
Yet, she did share a powerful statement on X, saying thousands of Zimbabweans who fought for the country’s liberation did not do so for the ZANU PF elite to merely replace the colonial elite.
Instead, they fought for the collective empowerment of all Zimbabweans, to ensure the fruits of independence were shared by the people. She wrote:
<blockquote>
There is a reason why our esteemed forebears called it a War of Liberation and not a War of Decolonisation. The guiding principle was to free the masses from all forms of repression and not simply to move them from Jail A to Jail B. It is not liberation if one violent oppressor is replaced by another.
Liberation means one man, one vote – not stolen elections.
Liberation means freedom from state-sponsored violence – not replacing a violent Rhodesian Special Branch with your own violent police force.
Liberation means gutsaruzhinji (everyone must eat) – not replacing colonial elites who eat alone with Zanu PF elites who eat alone.
Liberation means respecting the rights and liberties of every citizen – not replacing the repressive Law and Order Maintenance Act with your own repressive POSA or MOPA.
Liberation means ensuring every person has a decent life and equal access to freedom, fairness and opportunity.
The current state of affairs is a slap in the face to our true heroes who fought and lost their lives for the dream of a better Zimbabwe.
You may not respect us, but can you at least respect those who died to destroy what you now represent? It’s a mess. We need new leaders.
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Zimbabweans are arguing on X about President Mnangagwa's government and Ian Smith's Rhodesian regime. Some say Smith's regime was better. They built good things. But, others say we shouldn't celebrate Rhodesia. Fadzayi Mahere thinks we need new leaders who care for all Zimbabweans, not just the elite. She says our country's heroes fought for freedom for everyone, not just to replace one oppressor with another. Liberation means everyone should have a good life and equal opportunities. We need leaders who respect the people and the sacrifices made for our country.

Zimbabweans Clash On X Over ZANU PF Rule Vs. Ian Smith's Rhodesia

Zimbabwe is currently experiencing a critical electricity supply crisis that has profoundly affected its economic stability and the quality of life for its citizens.
The nation’s energy infrastructure is predominantly dependent on the ageing Hwange Thermal Power Station and the Kariba Hydroelectric Dam.
Both facilities are encountering significant operational inefficiencies attributed to insufficient maintenance protocols.
As of late 2024, Zimbabwe’s electricity generation capability has plummeted, frequently producing less than 35% of the total demand.
This shortfall has resulted in extensive power outages, with some regions enduring blackouts lasting up to 18 hours daily.
Let’s go back memory lane in 2010. The government aimed to enhance electricity generation capacity by investing in new power plants and refurbishing existing ones.
According to the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority (ZESA), “the country plans to increase its generation capacity through various projects, including the expansion of Kariba South Power Station and the construction of new thermal power stations.”
This strategy was intended not only to meet domestic demand but also to enable Zimbabwe to export surplus electricity to neighbouring countries, thereby generating revenue.
The significant question was how to effect the aforementioned. According to the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority (ZESA) in 2011, “the introduction of prepaid meters is expected to enhance revenue collection and improve cash flow,” which is crucial for financing operational costs and infrastructure upgrades.
By converting to a prepaid model, ZESA can better manage its resources and allocate funds towards critical maintenance and expansion projects.
The Zimbabwe Electricity Transmission and Distribution Company (ZETDC), a utility provider in Zimbabwe, commenced the installation of prepaid electricity meters in August 2012.
Zimbabwe implemented a prepaid electricity metering system primarily to mitigate several critical issues within its energy infrastructure.
Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority (ZESA), encountered substantial fiscal challenges stemming from elevated levels of arrears and an escalating debt crisis.
By adopting a prepaid metering framework, ZESA sought to enhance liquidity by mandating that consumers remit payment for electrical energy prior to usage, thereby diminishing the likelihood of default on payments. 
According to the Electricity Act [Chapter 13:19], ZESA is responsible for generating, transmitting, and distributing electricity.
It is required to maintain an effective electricity supply system, but this must be done within the limits of its available resources and infrastructure capabilities. ZESA is not obligated to ensure uninterrupted power.
Despite this statute which is used as an excuse, the prevailing situation raises critical inquiries regarding the efficacy of the leadership within the power utility sector.
It prompts an examination of whether the current administration exhibits a deficiency in managerial competence or if there exists a substantial volume of covert and unmonitored operational activities. 
Over the past thirteen years, consumers have been remitting payments for electricity that ostensibly encompass costs associated with infrastructure maintenance and facility expansion.
Nevertheless, empirical evidence suggests a stagnation or regression in service quality; rather than witnessing enhancements, there is an observable decline in both power generation facilities and supporting infrastructure, exacerbated at a rate surpassing that observed prior to the implementation of prepaid metering systems.
How then did we move from bad to worse in terms of power supply after the introduction of the prepaid metering system? How then did we end up in even more debt?
This scenario engenders a plethora of unresolved inquiries, leaving stakeholders with more uncertainties than clarifications.
Power outages have raised operating expenses and reduced productivity in the commercial sector. Particularly badly struck are sectors like manufacturing and agriculture, where companies frequently run at reduced capacity or close completely during outages.
Food insecurity and economic loss result from farmers’ challenges with irrigation and processing perishable commodities.
Additionally, in this uncertain environment, small enterprises that rely on a steady power supply for machinery or refrigeration find it difficult to thrive.
As a result, the economy as a whole experiences slowed growth, which exacerbates poverty and reduces job prospects.
The Zimbabwe Energy Regulatory Authority (ZERA) must fulfil its mandate of regulatory oversight over the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply Authority (ZESA) and conduct thorough investigations into grievances raised by the populace.
As stakeholders in both civic and consumer capacities, it is our prerogative to demand accountability from the power utility entity.
The citizenry has expressed significant fatigue regarding the recurring narratives surrounding infrastructural maintenance issues and diminished water resource levels.
This story was contributed by Gaylord Munemo, an emergency response specialist.
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Zimbabwe is having electricity problems because the power plants are old and not working well. There are many power outages lasting up to 18 hours each day. The government tried to fix this by using prepaid meters for electricity. But, things got worse, and now there is more debt and less power. Businesses are struggling when there is no electricity, causing economic problems. The government needs to check why things are not improving and make sure the power company is doing its job properly. People want answers and better electricity services to improve their lives.

Paying For Darkness: Citizens Struggle With Prepaid Power Failures

Former Finance Minister Tendai Biti says the Mutapa Investment Fund (MIF), previously known as the Sovereign Wealth Fund of Zimbabwe, has been used to covertly privatize the country’s most important parastatals.
The MIF is a state-owned investment fund established to manage and invest surplus funds generated from Zimbabwe’s natural resources.
Created through the Sovereign Wealth Fund Act in 2014, it was renamed in 2023 via Statutory Instrument 156.
The fund manages assets from various state-owned enterprises, including NetOne, National Railways of Zimbabwe, Air Zimbabwe, TelOne, and others.
Biti criticized the “privatization” of these parastatals, saying it was carried out without proper valuations or parliamentary oversight. Below are Biti’s comments on the MIF:
<blockquote>
The Mutapa Fund has essentially been a back door privatization of 40 or so of the country’s biggest and most important parastatals that include Hwange, NRZ, IDC and NetOne.
The process was done without individual valuations of the different parastatals and parliamentary scrutiny.
The Mutapa Fund now controls a huge chunk of the country’s balance sheet and yet it is not accountable to Parliament or a line ministry.
It is a huge Asset Management Fund, privately controlled, yet it houses State Assets. This kind of arbitrage and theft is a national threat.
The repeal of section 22 of the Sovereign Wealth Fund Act which prevents the Mutapa Fund from securitising the shares of parastatals it now controls is proof of arbitrage on steroids.
This regime has no limits, nor elasticity, no shame. The Mutapa Fund and those who control it are a national threat to the country’s sovereignty.
A country can’t be run on the philosophy and polity of looting for the sake of looting. The class of 2017 is a cabal, a ruthless brood whose only interest is to loot Zimbabwe dry. Self-respecting decent wananchi should say NO.
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Former Finance Minister Tendai Biti says the Mutapa Investment Fund (MIF) was used to secretly sell important state-owned companies in Zimbabwe. The fund was created in 2014 to manage money from natural resources, but it now controls assets like NetOne, National Railways of Zimbabwe, and Air Zimbabwe. Biti criticized this sale, saying it was done without proper checks. He called the fund a threat to the country's independence and accused the people in charge of only wanting to steal from Zimbabwe. This needs to stop, according to Biti.

Biti Says Mutapa Fund Used For Secretive Privatisation Of Parastatals

Former opposition Member of Parliament Fadzayi Mahere has criticized the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) following its request for public participation in a Customer Satisfaction Survey.
The RBZ stated that the survey aims to gather feedback from customers to better understand their experiences and identify areas for improvement. <a href="https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=TJ3OxyovCkKubw7m-T3sVQS7ovPjqRtDt1qqUdOZnS9UMUtGSU8yMFNNSVdHVFhJSlA4WVpYVkJURS4u&amp;route=shorturl">click here for the link to the survey</a>). The central bank said:
<blockquote>
We value your feedback and invite you to participate in our survey regarding the services provided by the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe in 2024. Your insights are crucial in helping us understand your experiences and identify areas for improvement. Please take a moment to answer the provided questions honestly and thoroughly. Your responses will remain confidential, and we will use them solely to enhance our service delivery.
</blockquote>
In response, Mahere argued that the RBZ should issue a public apology instead of inquiring about customer satisfaction, particularly given its failure to fulfill basic responsibilities, such as issuing a timely Monetary Policy Statement.
She also pointed out that the ZiG currency, launched by the RBZ in April 2024, is already out of circulation before the larger denominations were even released. Wrote Mahere on X:
<blockquote>
Oh my gosh – the audacity! For a minute I thought it was a parody account. How dare you ask about customer satisfaction when you failed to do the bare minimum of issuing a Monetary Policy Statement on time as is mandatory under the RBZ Act only to launch a dud of a currency that you pretended was backed by gold and is now out of circulation before the big notes were even released? Your incompetence is breathtaking and you owe us an apology.
Even your boss won’t take a chance with your ghost currency and gives donations and prizes in USD. The whole of SADC won’t touch it.
Everybody is highly dissatisfied. Your silly survey is tone deaf and doesn’t even canvass issues relevant to your actual mandate.
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Former MP Fadzayi Mahere is mad at RBZ for doing a customer survey instead of apologizing for issues like not releasing timely Monetary Policy Statements. She says the new ZiG currency failed, and no one wants it. Mahere thinks the survey is useless and doesn't address the real problems. RBZ wants feedback on its services, but Mahere says they need to say sorry for their mistakes first. She thinks RBZ should focus on fixing problems instead of asking about customer satisfaction.

"Even Your Boss Won't Touch ZiG", Mahere Slams RBZ Over Customer Satisfaction Survey

Zimbabwe faces significant challenges in meeting the social and economic rights of its citizens, as evidenced by various indicators such as GNP per capita, indices of social development, labour productivity, and the Social Progress Index.
As of 2024, Zimbabwe’s GNP per capita remains low compared to regional averages, indicating limited economic resources available for individual citizens.
The Social Development Index highlights deficiencies in health care, education, and living standards, which are critical components of social rights. 
Article 22 of the UDHR states, “Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international cooperation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.”
Article 22 of the Banjul Charter asserts that “All peoples shall have the right to their economic, social and cultural development with due regard to their freedom and identity and in equal enjoyment of the common heritage of mankind.”
Labor productivity has been hindered by economic instability and a lack of investment in infrastructure and human capital, further exacerbating poverty levels.
Additionally, the Social Progress Index reflects poor performance in areas such as personal rights and freedoms, access to basic knowledge, and environmental sustainability.
Collectively, these metrics suggest that Zimbabwe is struggling to fulfil its obligations to ensure adequate social and economic rights for its population.
The concept of social and economic well-being as a human right is grounded in the principles of progressive realization, which emphasizes that states have an obligation to progressively enhance the living conditions of their citizens.
This involves ensuring that social value is embedded within policies and practices, thereby fostering an environment where individuals can thrive economically and socially.
Adaptive social protection systems play a crucial role in this framework by providing safety nets that respond to the vulnerabilities faced by populations, particularly in times of crisis or change. 
These systems not only aim to alleviate poverty but also promote resilience and empowerment, reinforcing the idea that access to basic needs such as food, healthcare, education, and housing is fundamental to human dignity.
Thus, recognizing social and economic wellbeing as a human right underscores the responsibility of governments and societies to create inclusive frameworks that support all individuals in achieving their full potential.
In order to ensure social and economic well-being as a human right in Zimbabwe, the government, business sector entities, international agencies, and civil society organizations must all take a multipronged approach.
First and foremost, the government ought to give top priority to enacting laws that support fair access to necessities like housing, healthcare, and education.
This can be accomplished by giving these sectors larger budgetary allocations and making sure that resources are allocated equitably among all communities and regions.
It is crucial to promote economic opportunities by creating jobs. By lowering administrative barriers and offering assistance to small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs), the government should foster an atmosphere that encourages entrepreneurship.
International organizations can also help by offering financial support and technical assistance for development initiatives meant to boost productivity and infrastructure.
Furthermore, in order to fortify legislative frameworks that safeguard human rights, parties must cooperate. This involves ensuring that international treaties pertaining to social and economic rights are incorporated into national law and ratifying them.
Human rights education initiatives can enable citizens to effectively demand their rights. It is therefore imperative for every citizen to understand that they have the right to social and economic well-being and the government should play a pivotal role in ensuring that those rights are not thwarted by policies and frameworks which do not uphold the very foundations of human rights. 
This story was contributed by Gaylord Munemo, an emergency response specialist.
<section class="mt-6 leading-9 text-[1.1rem] border-b-2 border-gray-400 pb-2" id="article">
<div class="in_article">
<div>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>
</div>
</div>
</section>

Zimbabwe is struggling to give its people good social and economic rights. This means things like health care, education, and job opportunities. The government, businesses, and international groups need to work together to make things better. They should make laws that help everyone have access to basic needs. They also need to create jobs and improve infrastructure. People need to be educated about their rights so they can demand them. Everyone deserves a good life, and it's the government's job to make sure that happens.

Social And Economic Wellbeing: A Human Right

Former Finance Minister, Tendai Biti, has claimed that banks have been bailing out the government with civil servants’ pay, but some banks “refused to do this” in November leading to delays in payments of the ZiG component.
In an interview with <a href="https://www.zimlive.com/banks-said-no-biti-explains-why-some-civil-servants-not-paid-salaries-on-time/">ZimLive</a>, Biti said government revenues have “collapsed to the point that at the present moment, the regime has no capacity to pay wages.” Said Biti:
<blockquote>
Revenues seriously dipped after April 5 when they introduced the ZiG. Big companies reorganised. Some retrenched, some relocated and many middle-sized companies simply shut shop.
Only US$2.5 billion was collected up to September against a budget target of US$9 billion. In the last 10 years, the country has managed to collect at least US$4 billion as budget receipts annually but the regime will be lucky to collect US$3 billion by the end of this year.
</blockquote>
Thousands of civil servants did not receive the ZiG component of their salaries last month, which included half of their annual bonus.
Despite unions threatening to strike, the government has not explained why some workers did not receive their payments on time.
Two banks were especially impacted: POSB and AFC Holdings (formerly Agribank). POSB reportedly released salaries on November 29, while civil servants with accounts at AFC Holdings were paid on December 2. Said Biti:
<blockquote>
In the past few months, banks have actually been paying salaries for the government and then subsequently waiting for a reimbursement.
In November, they refused to do this. They are miffed by the government’s failure to honour what they are owed, particularly their Non-Negotiable Certificates of Deposits (NNCDs).
</blockquote>
Biti said that the government has spent millions of dollars in unbudgeted expenditure even as the revenues continue to dry up. He said:
<blockquote>
They have been living beyond their means. They did not pull any stops in preparation for the SADC summit in July where they spent millions of dollars.
But what has really killed them is the collapse in revenue collection as a result of a shrinking tax base.
Mthuli Ncube’s policies, particularly exchange control mismanagement and skewed revenue measures, have de-industrialised the country and increased informalisation. Big players have left this economy since 2018 thanks to this finance minister and his government.
This in turn has created a desperate response where Ncube has had to resort to indirect taxes to target the informal sector.
But indirect taxes are regressive and hit the working people harder. No wonder there is such unprecedented disaffection and discontent against [Emmerson] Mnangagwa and his regime.
</blockquote>
Biti said the government should “cut taxes, encourage spending and investment, liberalise the ZiG, if not scrap it, and a drastic cut to government expenditure.
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Former Finance Minister Tendai Biti said banks usually help the government pay civil servants, but some banks refused in November, causing delays in salaries. The government's revenue dropped a lot, making it hard to pay wages. Many workers didn't get their full pay last month. Biti blamed the government for spending too much and not collecting enough taxes. He thinks the government should lower taxes, spend less, and change some money policies to help the economy. Biti also said that the government should explain why some workers didn't get paid on time.

"Banks' Refusal To Bail Out Government Caused Delays In Civil Servants' Salaries"

United States-based Zimbabwean opposition activist Freeman Chari has suggested that the former leader of the Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC), Nelson Chamisa, personalised the movement through his doctrine of “Strategic Ambiguity.”
Chari claimed that when the CCC was established, there was a consensus on the necessity of a constitution and organisational structures.
However, he argued that the principle of Strategic Ambiguity subsequently overshadowed those initial agreements. Posting on X, Chari said:
<blockquote>
When CCC was formed in my conversations with NC a number of us said to him, we will defend you with our lives out there but in private we will tell you the things that need to be fixed so we don’t fall into the same predicament we did with MDC-Alliance.
Top was the need for a clear constitution with clearly articulated roles, I believe a draft constitution was made. Secondly, it was about structure &amp; I remember giving him a document that had alternative structure which I worked on with Dr Magaisa. Lastly it was about branding etc
Unfortunately Strategic Ambiguity took precedence. The people who defended this vehemently in private are the same pple after election who ditched him. They were opportunists esp the Harare crew. What pained me more was that we had worked so hard for 2 yrs to build this but we had no way or leg to defend ourselves. Anyone could see our potential flaws but they were overlooked.
This carried into the elections &amp; candidate selection. We all know bereka mwana was stupid, but these comrades who supported it before they were outwitted/ousted shld have known better way before this. They were selfish and thought they could keep their proximity to power through stupidity.
After elections when NC failed to reign in the few MPs we had I cld see we were sitting ducks. Every bara was hitting the head. In my view, even through ego we had continued on Strategic Ambiguity, if the fundamentals of organization building had been done right behind the scenes we could have had a fighting chance.
I fear without the willingness to retrospect and introspect we will go round and round in circles with multiple heartbreaks. I am not willing to go through that again!
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Nelson Chamisa's way of leading the Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC) was criticized by Freeman Chari. Chari said that instead of focusing on important things like a clear constitution and structure, Chamisa emphasized Strategic Ambiguity. Chari and others tried to advise Chamisa in private, but their concerns were ignored. This caused problems during the elections and candidate selection. Chari believes that without looking back and learning, the CCC will keep facing disappointments. Chari does not want to go through that again.

Chamisa's Leadership Style Destroyed CCC - Chari

Former Finance Minister Tendai Biti has criticized the 2025 National Budget presented by Mthuli Ncube on Thursday, describing it as shallow, dishonest, and out of touch with the needs of the people.
In a post on X, Biti said that the budget reflects the incompetence and corruption of President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s administration.
He further criticized the proposed tax measures, claiming they show a lack of empathy and disproportionately target vulnerable sectors.
Biti also argued that the budget fails to address the pressing issue of critical energy shortages. He wrote:
<blockquote>
The 2024 Budget Statement was presented in the backdrop of a tough and challenging year for the working people of Zimbabwe.
A year in which the citizen had been abused by extreme levels of inflation, emasculation by a rigged exchange rate, extortionate taxes, power shortages, poverty, and the aftermath of a scorching drought.
Naively, the citizen and businesses thus hoped for a BOLD, HONEST DECISIVE &amp; TECHNICALLY SOUND budget that would address the crippling challenges of the day and offer hope &amp; catharsis to a broken fatalistic desperate and disparate population.
Regrettably, Minister Ncube’s budget was nothing but a shallow, hollow, narcissistic, dishonest anti-people ritual. 
The Budget correctly bluetooths everything cataleptic about the Mnangwagwa regime: incompetence, ideologically vacuous, corrupt, insensitive, vicious and toxic.
Seven issues amplify the fatality of Mthuli’s project. First is the clear failure to calibrate the Budget in US$. In a volatile high inflation environment expressing the Budget in a local currency ravaged by serious inflation pressures is clearly a faux pas.
Zim has gone through six bouts of currency failures and any budget expressed in a local currency is a facade. A volatile ZIG also creates accounting chaos for businesses. Ultimately, a ZIG-based budget is simply a means to hide and mislead the true depth of economic mismanagement
Second Mr Ncube’s microeconomic framework and projections are simply unsound and blatantly dishonest. A 2 % GDP growth for 2024 is simply overstated.
It underestimates the ZIG-induced depression that has captured markets since 5 April 2024. A period that has seen many companies close or downsize.
There has been a massive curtailment of revenue inflows in companies and in the government itself. Aggregate demand simply collapsed resulting in Government revenues also collapsing to the point that at the present moment regime has no capacity to pay wages.
The budget projection of a 6 % growth in 2025 is dross. It is based on 3 assumptions viz decent rainfall, low inflation and a stable currency, and a tight fiscal and monetary policy. Expecting this government to live within its means and to keep a tight fiscal ship is madness.
The regime must monetize its rent-seeking projects particularly the feeding trough that road construction has become.
Particularly command agriculture and multiple Presidential schemes. Once the boys are paid broad money shoots through the roof. Inflation spikes and the ZIG falls.
Third, the 2025 budget framework is unsound and must be rejected by Parliament. In 2024 ZIG110,722 billion in revenue will be collected against projected expenditure of ZIG 119.972 resulting in a deficit of ZIG 9.3 billion. (they don’t sing about surpluses anymore).
In 2025 projected revenue jumps to ZIG 276.4 billion or US$ 7.5 billion. Whilst expenditure is ZIG 276.3 billion or US$7,668 billion.
On a growth of 6%, it eludes one’s wisdom how revenue will grow by 150% from ZIG110 billion in 2024 to ZIG 276 billion.
Put in another way, Mr Ncube expects 2024 revenues of ZIG 110 billion or US 3.05 billion to jump to US$7,5 billion.
This mendacity reflects disrespect for Zimbabwean intellect. More than that reflects total and utter contempt of Parliament. But the real issue is where will.
Mr Ncube extracted US$7,5 billion when companies have been squeezed dry and closing down retrenching or relocating.
Fourth the regime proposed revenue measures are narcissistic and lack empathy. Imposing taxes on betting income, on Pizza and chicken inn is ridiculous.
Targeting informal traders in spare parts dealers, groceries, hardware, lodgers, fabric merchandisers and boutiques for taxation is cruel and ridiculous.
The regime suffers from the warped view that it can extract money from stone. The pathological obsession with taxation is sickening
There is a crisis of under-accumulation in Zimbabwe. Companies are shutting down and unemployment is on the rise.
The 2025 Budget had a duty to create a stimulus and to provide incentives for consumption &amp; production to jump-start the economy.
Taxes had to be reduced various stimuli provided. Instead, a vacuous bankrupt government went the opposite of what logic dictated.
Sixth there had to be a push for currency reform. ZIG has failed and failed in absolute terms. The epicentre of the Zim crises is exchange rate mismanagement.
Finally, given the current structural energy crises the Budget ought to have addressed the power situation. Indeed it is ridiculous to imagine the economy will grow by 6% without power. No wonder and very poignantly ZESA went off during the Budget presentation.
Truth is, this is the worst government in the history of governments and the 2025 Budget is a further exhibit of this fact.
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Tendai Biti, a former Finance Minister, says the 2025 National Budget is bad and doesn't help people. He thinks the government is not good at managing money. Biti doesn't like the proposed tax increases and thinks they hurt poor people. He also says the budget does not solve the energy crisis. Biti believes the government is dishonest and only cares about itself. Overall, he thinks the budget is very bad and will make things worse for Zimbabwe.

Biti Slams 2025 National Budget As Shallow And Out of Touch

Former Member of Parliament for Mt Pleasant, Fadzayi Mahere (CCC), has urged the Minister of Finance, Economic Development, and Investment Promotion, Mthuli Ncube, to present the 2025 National Budget in US dollars instead of the ZiG currency, which is prone to depreciation.
Ncube is expected to announce the budget this Thursday, November 28, at the New Parliament in Mt Hampden.
Mahere also advised Ncube to avoid introducing new taxes. Instead, she suggested reducing or removing VAT on small businesses, the 2% tax on banking transactions, the sugar tax, and import duties on basic goods. Said Mahere:
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>BUDGET WARNING: Today Mthuli Ncube will make his 2025 Budget Statement. The biggest mistake he can make would be to announce tax increases on an already shrinking tax base. Instead, he should do the following:</li>
<li>Announce tax incentives (especially for corporations) to encourage compliance;</li>
<li>Reduce the corporate tax rate remove the unnecessary VAT on small businesses to stimulate productivity;</li>
<li>Find ways to widen the tax base as opposed to squeezing the few who pay tax;</li>
<li>Reduce toll fees and fuel levies to reduce the overall cost of goods;</li>
<li>Remove or reduce the 2% tax on banking transactions to reduce the overall cost of doing business;</li>
<li>Remove the sugar tax;</li>
<li>Remove or reduce the ridiculous property tax;</li>
<li>Remove import duty on basic goods to decrease the overall cost of living;</li>
<li>Remove obstacles on trade between manufacturers and retail suppliers;</li>
<li>State the budget in realistic USD figures so that it’s not a circus of announcing meaningless figures that are certain to devalue and which will in most instances never be disbursed.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Former MP Fadzayi Mahere wants Finance Minister Mthuli Ncube to announce the 2025 budget in US dollars to prevent depreciation. She also advises against new taxes. Instead, Mahere suggests reducing or removing taxes on small businesses, banking transactions, sugar, and import duties. She wants tax incentives for compliance, lowering corporate taxes, widening the tax base, and reducing toll fees and fuel levies. Mahere also wants property tax and obstacles on trade removed. She wants the budget stated in USD to prevent the devaluation of the currency.

Mahere Urges Mthuli To Avoid New Taxes, Present Budget In USD

Outspoken former Chivi South legislator Killer Zivhu (ZANU PF) has claimed that white employers in Zimbabwe treat their Black employees better than their Chinese counterparts.
In a post on X, Zivhu said he was “appalled” at the treatment of his cousin, who works as a driver for a Chinese employer.
He alleged that his cousin is forced to sleep in his car and cook meals in Bulawayo, which he then eats over three days in Harare, while his Chinese bosses enjoy comfortable hotel accommodations and fine dining. Said Zivhu:
<blockquote>
Appalled by Chinese nationals’ treatment of Blacks in Zimbabwe! My cousin, a driver, sleeps in cars while they enjoy hotels. Cooks his meals in Bulawayo kuti agozodya ku Harare for 3 days, while they dine lavishly. White people show more dignity towards Blacks than Chinese.
</blockquote>
Since 2000, when the Zimbabwean government seized farms from white farmers and adopted the “Look East” policy, there has been a significant influx of Chinese nationals, particularly in the mining sector.
However, numerous reports indicate that Chinese employers often mistreat their Black workers, paying them meagre wages and subjecting them to inhumane working conditions.
In September of this year, Daniel Molokele, the Member of Parliament for Hwange Central, criticized Chinese coal miners in the district for failing to adhere to Zimbabwe’s laws.
This came after residents of Ingagula township in Hwange raised concerns about excessive dust pollution caused by the haulage trucks and coal mining activities of the Chinese operators.
Molokele further alleged that Chinese investors are protected from scrutiny due to their connections with influential politicians in Harare.
In August, Farai Maguwu, the founding director of the Centre for Natural Resource Governance, described the growth of Chinese mining operations in Zimbabwe as a form of “organised crime” due to their exploitative practices.
He argued that mines established in Zimbabwe since 2000 have not contributed meaningfully to the improvement of the communities in which they operate. Said Maguwu:
<blockquote>
Mining that is conducted in Zimbabwe is organised crime, it is not really formal. In terms of mines that started operating after the year 2000, the one that I think is a demonstration of unit of environmental social or governance risk is Zimplats.
If you go to Zimplats you will realise that they have invested in the road infrastructure, and they have built a town such that even if Zimplats is said to have ceased operations in Zimbabwe, that settlement will continue to exist.
They have built houses for their staff, it is actually a town that they have built. But those coming from China, they have no intention to stay here, they have no intention to transform the place from the way they found it and turn it into a better place.
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

White employers are treating Black workers better than Chinese employers in Zimbabwe. Former lawmaker Killer Zivhu shared how his cousin, who works for a Chinese boss, has to sleep in his car and cook his own meals while the bosses enjoy luxury. Chinese investors in Zimbabwe, especially in the mining sector, are under fire for mistreating employees and not following the country's laws. Chinese mining operations have been described as organized crime by some experts, with little benefit to local communities. This has raised concerns about the impact of Chinese investment in Zimbabwe.

White Employers Treat Black Workers Better Than Chinese, Says Killer Zivhu

Stephen Chan, a professor of world politics at SOAS, University of London, has warned Zimbabwe against “carelessly” antagonising Qatar.
This warning follows Mehluli Dube, a former Fidelity Printers official, who secured the attachment of Al Jazeera’s property after being implicated in the “Gold Mafia” documentary, which exposed Zimbabwe’s gold smuggling syndicates.
Episode 2, titled “Smoke and Mirrors,” accused Dube of corruptly signing off licenses for gold smuggling, allegedly receiving US$3,000 per month.
Dube claims the documentary damaged his reputation and sought a court order to attach Al Jazeera’s property as part of a defamation claim against the “peregrini respondent” (an international party not domiciled within the court’s jurisdiction).
Justice Siyabona Musithu granted Dube’s request in a ruling at the Harare High Court. Musithu said that the case was of public interest and deserved to be tested in court to determine the validity of the allegations.
He affirmed that the High Court has jurisdiction, and thus, Al Jazeera’s property could indeed be held as requested.
Posting on X, Chan suggested the lawsuit might be sponsored by Zimbabwean authorities as revenge against Al Jazeera for exposing corruption among the elite.
He warned that such a move could backfire, considering Qatar’s substantial international influence.
He wrote:
<blockquote>
An interesting lawsuit. Whether it has merit, the courts will decide. If it is somehow a ‘sponsored’ suit in revenge against Al Jazeera, it should be kept in mind Qatar’s huge international influence. Not a country to pick a fight with carelessly.
</blockquote>
Al Jazeera, a state-funded broadcaster based in Doha, Qatar, is used by the Gulf State as a powerful tool to advance its foreign policy through public diplomacy.
By broadcasting news and perspectives that align with its interests, Qatar can influence public opinion and elite views both regionally and internationally.
Several countries have restricted Al Jazeera. Egypt has banned Al Jazeera since 2013, accusing it of inciting violence.
Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have blocked Al Jazeera’s websites and channels.
Bahrain has restricted Al Jazeera’s broadcasts, and Israel has called for the closure of Al Jazeera’s Jerusalem bureau and blocked its transmission.
These restrictions are often part of broader political conflicts and accusations of biased or provocative coverage.
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Zimbabwe is warned not to fight with Qatar over a documentary about gold smuggling. An official mentioned in the documentary went to court to sue Al Jazeera, the broadcaster, for defamation. The court allowed him to attach Al Jazeera's property. A professor warned that Zimbabwe should not anger Qatar, who has a lot of power internationally, by suing the broadcaster. Al Jazeera is known for influencing public opinion, and some countries have even banned or restricted it. In the end, the lawsuit could cause more trouble for Zimbabwe if they are not careful.

Zimbabwe Advised To Avoid Confrontation With Qatar Over "Gold Mafia"

Zimbabwe’s ruling elite and the politically connected may be attempting to sell land acquired during the land reform programme at no cost, following the government’s announcement of a new model allowing beneficiaries to sell their land, according to a former cabinet minister.
The chaotic fast-track land reform programme began at the turn of the millennium when former independence fighters invaded approximately 4,000 farms owned by white farmers.
This led to the politically connected and their families seizing vast tracts of land, with some occupying multiple farms.
On Tuesday, the government announced that beneficiaries of the programme could sell or transfer their farms, but only to “indigenous Zimbabweans.”
In an interview with <a href="https://www.newsday.co.zw/local-news/article/200033401/new-land-laws-biggest-heist">NewsDay</a>, self-exiled former Foreign Affairs Minister Walter Mzembi described the process as opaque, suggesting that those with political connections stand to profit. He said:
<blockquote>
It is the biggest heist by this class since independence driven by policy itself and done under very opaque processes with no constitutional provisions compliance, consent from the people (referendum), audits, compliance with one family one farm, maximum land sizes and just waking up bestowing title to a replacement black bourgeoisie whose criteria to land ownership only God knows and boom cash out.
It is a policy reversal of the land reform programme as originally envisaged.
There will be numerous, in fact, hundreds of ‘black fronted’ land ownership transactions by former occupiers and foreigners, as much as there is leased farming by the same today.
It is a free ride by our own elite, with no Bill to the elite beneficiaries (zero rate) and titling their unverified, unaudited, no-trespass acquisitions.
</blockquote>
Currently, some beneficiaries of the land reform programme are not producing anything on their farms; instead, they are leasing the land to landless farmers who were unable to benefit from the programme.
These beneficiaries are collecting rent from these farmers, despite having received the land at no cost from the government.
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Zimbabwe's leaders might let people sell land they got for free. The land reform program took land from white farmers and gave it to politically connected people. Now, the government says these people can sell their land, but only to other Zimbabweans. Critics say this is unfair and benefits the elite. Some landowners are not even farming the land they got; they are renting it out. This new policy is a change from the original land reform program.

"Zimbabwe's New Farm Policy A Reversal Of Land Reform"

Journalist and government critic Hopewell Chin’ono described the Zimbabwean government’s new policy allowing Black Zimbabweans who received farmland for free to sell it as not just “foolish,” but also criminal.
In a post on X, Chin’ono argued that expropriated land should belong to the government. He asserted that anyone willing and able to farm should be permitted to use the land for a fee or purchase it directly from the government, rather than from beneficiaries of farm invasions. Below is Chin’ono’s statement in full:
<blockquote>
The Zimbabwean government announced a new cabinet policy yesterday that will allow Black Zimbabweans who received farmland for free to sell it to Black Zimbabweans who did not. Do you see how absurd this reads?
This is not only economically foolish but criminal too. One person receives something for free, sells it for a profit, and the one who didn’t get the land is expected to fund the original land grab. Crazy stuff!
Although Zimbabwe’s tyrant and dictator, Emmerson Mnangagwa, is well known internationally as a thoroughly corrupt man, and it is clear that he and his goons want to profit from this, it will not work.
First, only a fool or a gang member of the looting club would buy contested land. Any farmland obtained after 2000, during the ZANUPF land invasions, is still contested to this day. 
Title can only change hands when the former White farmers sign a deed of cession. A deed of cession is a legal document transferring property ownership from one party to another. It allows a lender (bank) to sell the property to recover an outstanding debt. 
Former white farmers will not sign this until they are fully compensated, as the Zimbabwean regime under Mnangagwa had committed to doing in 2018.
That land should belong to the government, and anyone willing and able to farm should be allowed to use it for a fee or to buy it from government and not from beneficiaries of farm invasions and fast track land transfers. When they no longer need it, they should return it to the government.
However, this government, composed of crooks who have already looted billions of YOUR money, seeks another big payout by crafting a law that allows them to sell the many farms they invaded, many which are idle.
As long as the properties on that land are not paid for, and the white farmers have not signed the deed of cession, anyone buying that land under a ZANUPF law is throwing money away. It will eventually be contested, as we have seen many times before.
A notable example is Uganda. Dictator Idi Amin ordered the seizure of all businesses owned by Asians, just as ZANUPF did with farmland. He handed them to his cronies. 
Ugandans were told they could buy those businesses from each other as Mnangagwa is attempting to do with the land, but it did not work in the long run because economics doesn’t work that way.
When the current Ugandan ruler, General Yoweri Museveni, came to power in 1986, his government had to track down those Asian owners or their descendants and pay them compensation because no serious investor wanted to touch those contested businesses except the crooks amongst themselves.
Uganda eventually compensated for properties seized from Asians during the Idi Amin era. After Amin was overthrown in 1979, the new government established the Departed Asians Property Custodial Board to manage the seized properties.
In 1992, General Museveni announced that the properties would be returned to their original owners or their descendants, with compensation paid for those that had been sold or destroyed.
The expulsion of Asians from Uganda was a traumatic event with lasting consequences for the country’s economy and society, much like ZANU PF’s land invasions that destroyed Zimbabwe’s economy. 
Nearly every business was linked to farming, and when farming collapsed, everything else followed.
The issue at the moment is not about selling and buying land, it is about the investment world having zero confidence in anything ZANUPF says due to a well established track record of lies and fake promises.
A 99-year lease would have been sufficient to make land tradeable, but this failed because Mnangagwa continued with land invasions. Nobody holding land today is safe unless they are part of the ZANUPF leadership.
As long as people can lose their farms due to party affiliation or political views, farmland will never be a worthwhile long-term investment for any serious business person, farming is a business. 
The land is owned by the government, which must pay compensation as promised and then allow any Zimbabwean to buy it from the government without political conditions.
Why should someone who invaded 21 farms and holds them in their custody be allowed to sell them when they paid nothing for them? How is this any different from colonialism?
This is criminal and should be REJECTED in its entirety by all sane Zimbabweans!
What Mnangagwa and his ZANUPF cabinet want will lead to serious political problems and upheavals that led to a war of independence, including the economic viability of such a move, the legal status of the land, and the moral implications of profiting from an unfair distribution of resources.
In his State of the Nation Address (SONA),the Zimbabwean dictator stated that he was compensating 94 former white farmers, providing them with US$20 million. 
What you need to know is that these farmers are linked only to Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (BIPPA), and around 70% of them are Dutch.
A BIPPA, or Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement, is an international agreement between two countries aimed at promoting and protecting foreign investment. 
The agreement includes provisions that protect investors from discriminatory treatment, expropriation of assets, and unfair restrictions on the repatriation of profits.
ZANUPF violated these agreements regardless of having signed them, a terrible track record of not honouring legal agreements.
We also have 650 Black farmers who lost their land to ZANUPF’s fast-track land invasions. They were told that they would get their farms back under Statutory Instrument 62 of 2020. 
However, they did not regain their farms. How can a sane person buy that land when it is contested and without a deed of cession? Remember, these are not even white farmers, they are Black farmers.
There are 4,500 title deeds in contention, yet Mnangagwa only mentioned 94 in his SONA address. Who will pay these thousands of former white farmers?
How can one establish such a policy without a comprehensive land audit that assesses how many invaded farms one owns, what they have produced, and the amount of taxes they have paid to the Zimbabwean fiscus?
Land policy will require a national strategy based on economic viability and a non-partisan approach. 
No one should benefit from selling land they did not purchase from the state or the former land owners. 
Additionally, agreements with the banking sector are crucial, as arrangements solely with ZANUPF hold little value to the rest of the world.
Lastly, is what ZANUPF wants to do based on Leasehold or Freehold title? Freehold and leasehold are two different types of property ownership, with distinct differences in terms of the rights and responsibilities of the owner.
With freehold ownership, the owner holds the title to the land and the buildings on it, the owner has full control over the property and is free to make any changes or improvements, subject to local planning regulations, the owner is responsible for maintaining the property and paying for any repairs or upkeep, the owner has the right to live in the property for as long as they choose and can sell it at any time.
With leasehold ownership, the owner has the right to occupy the property for a fixed period, typically 99.
The owner does not own the land, but instead has a lease agreement with the freeholder, who owns the land and in this case it would be government.
The lease agreement sets out the terms of the lease, including the amount of ground rent that must be paid to the freeholder each year, the owner may be required to obtain permission from the freeholder before making any changes to the property.
All these things are not addressed because in my view this is not done in good faith, but to steal and plunder billions of dollars from selling land if they do get clowns willing to put money down the drain.
How do you get free land, free mechanisation equipment, free inputs, free fuel and free equipment maintenance every year, yet you ask the taxpayer to pay the previous farmers while you get the right to sell on the land, it is mindless and uneconomic looting that only a person with a criminal mind can defend?
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

The Zimbabwean government has a new policy that allows Black Zimbabweans who got farmland for free to sell it. A journalist named Hopewell Chin'ono thinks this is foolish and criminal. He says the land should belong to the government, not individuals. An example from Uganda shows that selling contested land leads to problems. He thinks the government wants to profit from this policy. He believes the land should be owned by the government, leased to farmers, and returned when not needed. Buying land based on this new policy is risky and will not work in the long run. It is not a good idea, and it should be rejected by everyone in Zimbabwe.

New Policy Permitting Land Reform Beneficiaries To Sell Farms Is "Foolish" And "Criminal" - Chin'ono

Former ZANU PF Mashonaland West provincial chairman Temba Mliswa believes that the court’s decision to allow the corruption trial of Mike Chimombe and Moses Mpofu to be broadcast live indicates the involvement of a hidden influence in the case.
Chimombe and Mpofu have been in custody for over two months on corruption charges totalling more than US$7 million.
Their trial has been postponed to October 22 of this year. The duo appeared in the High Court in Harare on Thursday last week, with the proceedings broadcast live on ZTN.
They are accused of misappropriating approximately US$7.7 million from the Presidential Goat Pass-On Scheme.
In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Mliswa suggested that an ex-convict is orchestrating events behind the scenes to humiliate the two men.
While Mliswa did not disclose the identity of this individual, some commentators speculate that the arrests of Chimombe and Mpofu are linked to their conflict with Wicknell Chivayo, an ex-convict with close ties to President Emmerson Mnangagwa.
The duo had leaked audio recordings alleging corruption involving Chivayo and several high-ranking state officials, and their prosecution is seen as a form of retaliation for disclosing information and “talking while they were eating.”
Mliswa asserted that it is only a matter of time before the tables turn against the ex-convict behind Chimombe and Mpofu’s prosecution. He wrote:
<blockquote>
I didn’t want to comment on the Chimomb and Mpofu case but the latest revelations that the case will be broadcasted live has confirmed my suspicions that there is a third hand behind. The case is more political than legal as all vestiges of the latter have fallen away.
The theatrics are efforts of a hidden hand making a statement of power. The basic facts of the case itself would allow, for Chimombe to be given bail long back as he has nothing to do with the case. It’s not his company and he was never part of the negotiations for the goat deal.
Yet the hidden hand seeks to flex its power and flaunt its extravagant leverage in ZANU-PF. We all know who the third hand is but time is our master. An ex-convict can only survive for so long even with all the money to silence and buy support.
Ende ZANU PF hayiiswe muhomwe such that one can wantonly abuse others like this. Some of us experienced the same with ZRP Commissioner Chihuri during his reign.
I was persecuted and dragged through courts unceasingly. Yet Mwari ndewemumhu wese. Nhasi aripi Chihuri?
It’s a warning to all those tugging the strings behind the scenes. When you have access to higher offices utilise it for positive things not wanton abuse of others. If this were the biggest corruption case we could believe the need to televise all that.
Yet even bigger corruption cases, like the Sandura Commission, have been held away from the limelight. It’s very sad how a whole system can be corrupted and abused to pander to the whims of a monied person.
Still, there is a limit to the use of money to buy control and leverage in the party. One day zvinopera chete. We know who is behind all this. God isn’t for one person.
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Two men, Chimombe and Mpofu, are in trouble for stealing money from a government scheme. A man named Mliswa says there is someone powerful behind their trial trying to embarrass them. This person might be connected to a man called Chivayo who is close to the President. Mliswa says this hidden influence won't last forever and that God is watching. The trial of Chimombe and Mpofu was shown on TV, which is unusual. Mliswa thinks this is all a political game to show power.

Temba Mliswa Says Hidden Forces At Play In Chimombe And Mpofu's Corruption Trial

Renowned Zimbabwean journalist and filmmaker Hopewell Chin’ono says the country’s land reform programme, which was accelerated by the Robert Mugabe administration around 2000, needs to be redone.
Chin’ono said that productive farmers should receive land, rather than allowing politically connected individuals to acquire large tracts of land that they subsequently lease out.
Chin’ono’s remarks came in response to a statement issued on Tuesday, October 1, by Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP) spokesperson Commissioner Paul Nyathi concerning allegations that community members invaded Strathmore Farm in Banket and stole potatoes.
Commissioner Nyathi said the farm belongs to Retired High Court Judge Vernanda Cecil Ziyambi and is currently leased to Jonathan Timothy Mackwade for potato farming.
He also said preliminary investigations suggest the farm manager authorised farm workers and locals to collect damaged potatoes from the harvested field the day after the harvest was completed.
In his comments, Chin’ono asserted that land is currently held by the wrong people and should be reallocated to those who will use it productively. Wrote Chin’ono on X:
<blockquote>
To my South African friends and followers on this timeline who are always asking me why Zimbabweans come to South Africa to do menial jobs when they have land in Zimbabwe. Below is your answer.
What you are reading in the document in the quoted tweet (statement by Commissioner Nyathi) explains what went wrong with land reform in Zimbabwe.
Land is given to those connected to ZANU-PF, but they are not necessarily farmers.
They then rent the farms to white farmers who were kicked off the land, so what happened in Zimbabwe is not land reform, but thugs taking over land and renting it out instead of giving it to people with expertise to use it.
In a normal society, a judge who is not a farmer would not have been given land only to rent it out to the real farmer. 
This makes food in Zimbabwe more expensive because the farmer has to pay rent to someone who produces nothing and got the land for free without paying a penny.
Judges receive these farms as a thank you for passing illegal rulings against the regime’s political opponents! 
Land is in the hands of the wrong people. 
If the real farmer had been given access to this state land, the cost of potatoes would be cheaper because they wouldn’t have to factor in rent paid to the “farmer-owner.”
Land reform will have to be redone in Zimbabwe in a way that is sustainable, fair, and economic. 
What ZANU PF did is akin to invading a plane without knowing how to fly it, then asking the pilot to use it for a while in exchange for rentals.
The real farmer can’t develop the farm because it is not in their name, as they can be kicked off by the official owner.
Land is in the hands of a ZANUPF mafia that charges protection fees/rentals to white farmers to allow them to continue farming.
This practice perpetuates historical inequalities and has negative economic consequences for the country.
The cost of food production rises due to this added layer of rent, and the overall productivity of the agricultural sector suffers because experienced farmers are not given the opportunity to fully utilise their skills and resources.
A sustainable and equitable land reform process would prioritise allocating land to those with the knowledge and experience to use it effectively.
This would not only improve agricultural productivity but also help address historical injustices and empower previously disadvantaged communities.
Today, the majority of the previously disadvantaged are still disadvantaged. I was one of the top three Boer goat breeders in Zimbabwe from around 2015 doing it at my ancestral plot.
A former governor for Mashonaland East asked me to join ZANUPF if I wanted land. Of course, I politely said no.
The judge can’t own land, it is state land. She has a lease, and because she is part of the ruling elite, she can rent it out and make money from something she didn’t pay a penny for. Her husband, Tarisai Ziyambi, was also a government minister.
If people who can produce and have the production expertise have to beg people who can’t produce for land, it is a Banana Republic. Zimbabwe is a crime scene!!!!
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Zimbabwe needs to redo land reform because wrong people have land. Land is given to politically connected people who rent it out. This makes farming more expensive and lowers productivity. The real farmers are not given a chance to use the land effectively. Land reform should be fair and give land to those who can use it well. Currently, those with expertise in farming are overlooked. Hopewell Chin'ono says land reform should be redone in a way that helps everyone, not just a few people.

Zimbabwe’s Land Reform Programme Must Be Redone - Chin'ono

Economic commentator Gift Mugano has warned the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) against floating the exchange rate without adequate foreign currency reserves.
Mugano said the move by Zimbabwe’s central bank on Friday, 27 September, to liberalise the ZiG currency is “suicidal” adding that the RBZ “just put nail on the ZiG coffin.” He said:
<blockquote>
In our instance, I think we are now at a deeper end. We are in the middle of the storm, that we have adopted a local currency, we do not have enough reserves and we are supposed to liberalise.
So, it’s like committing suicide and again if you don’t liberalise you are still committing suicide again. We need to go back to the drawing board and say how do we address this.
</blockquote>
Instead of liberalising the exchange rate, Mugano suggested that the RBZ should scrap the ZiG, return to USD mono-currency, and introduce the ZiG when the time is ripe – when the right fundamentals are in place.
A Harare-based economist, who declined to be named for professional reasons, told <a href="https://www.businessweekly.co.zw/gold-backed-currency-fails-to-stem-zims-economic-challenges/">Business Weekly</a> that liberalisation and maintaining controls present significant risks, and “there is no easy solution.” Said the economist:
<blockquote>
The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe is facing a daunting task. Liberalising the foreign exchange market could lead to hyperinflation while maintaining controls could exacerbate shortages and inefficiencies.
The Government must carefully consider the potential consequences of both options.
A poorly executed liberalisation could have disastrous consequences for the economy.
The best solution for Zimbabwe may lie in a gradual and carefully managed approach to liberalisation, combined with targeted measures to address the underlying causes of economic instability.
</blockquote>
On Friday, September 27, the central bank devalued the ZiG by over 40% against the US dollar, changing the exchange rate from 14.1 ZiG per dollar to 24.3 ZiG per dollar.
However, the RBZ has not clarified whether the currency will float freely or if it will continue to control the exchange rate after the devaluation.
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Economic expert Mugano warns that Zimbabwe should not float the exchange rate without enough foreign money. He thinks doing this is like killing the ZiG currency. Mugano suggests Zimbabwe should go back to using USD only and bring back the ZiG later when everything is ready. Another economist says liberalizing or controlling the exchange rate both have risks. Zimbabwe needs to be careful and make smart decisions to avoid making things worse. The central bank devalued the ZiG by 40% on September 27, but it's not clear if they will let it float freely or control it.

Floating The ZiG A Dangerous Move, Warns Mugano

Local economist Gift Mugano has warned the government against hastily banning the current multi-currency regime and making the Zimbabwe Gold (ZiG) currency the sole legal tender.
Mugano made the comments in response to calls from some sectors to eliminate the use of the United States dollar, particularly as the local currency has experienced rapid devaluation on the parallel market just five months after its introduction. Wrote Mugano:
<blockquote>
I hear repeated calls for the introduction of mono-currency in favour of ZiG (banning USD).
My 2 cents advice is that if GoZ bans the USD it will be the biggest loser because the informal sector will not dump the USD – GoZ will lose tax in USD.
Policy only works in a formal economy. In circumstances where the informal sector is so huge, IT CANNOT WORK!
Where we are, GOZ must let USD work as a mono currency &amp; work on establishing the right fundamentals for the introduction of a local currency which inter alia include:
1. Building a productive &amp; competitive economy
2. Building foreign currency reserves averaging 6 months import cover (US$4.5 billion)
3. Fiscal consolidation – reducing public debt to levels averaging 30% of GDP
4. Stable exchange rates with distortions not exceeding 10%
5. Current account surplus
6. Single digit inflation
7. Establishment of strong institutions with enough teeth to rein corruption &amp; other social ills including fostering rule of law
8. National cohesion – credible elections, elimination of toxic politics, no crackdown of opposition &amp; weaponisation of judiciary
9. Provision of critical enablers such as affordable &amp; reliable electricity, fuel, transport (road, rail &amp; air), ICT, water &amp; sanitation, health and education.
10. Confidence – if we put in place the points I raised from 1 – 9, we will ensure that there is confidence.
This is not a walk in the park. This will not happen overnight. If we are not careful, it will take us decades to have our local currency.
Already, we have travelled 27 years with currency crisis since the Black Friday of 14 November 1997!
The challenge I give to the GoZ is to undertake a comprehensive research focused on the need to understand why our currencies are failing &amp; what needs to be done.
This is critical in view of the fact that we have lost many currencies in recent years!
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

In simple words, an economist named Gift Mugano is warning the government not to rush into banning the use of different currencies in Zimbabwe. He says if they only allow one currency, the government may lose out on tax money because people in the informal sector will keep using the US dollar. Mugano suggests the government should focus on fixing the economy before introducing a new local currency. He lists things that need to be done before a new currency can be successful. Mugano says it will take a long time and a lot of work to have a stable local currency in Zimbabwe.

Rushing To Ban Multi-Currency Regime Could Backfire, Warns Mugano

ZANU PF-aligned political commentator Kudzai Mutisi believes that Zimbabwe’s policymakers are conflicted, which is why they aren’t properly promoting the use of the ZiG, as it might hurt their personal interests.
In a post on X, Mutisi argued that regular people shouldn’t be blamed for the ZiG’s poor performance, as they have always supported local currencies over the years.
He claimed that it’s the policymakers who “hate” the ZiG, as shown by their refusal to sell fuel in local currency or accept ZiG for wheat.
Mutisi suggested that these policymakers likely own fuel stations and are involved in wheat farming, which is why they hesitate to accept ZiG in these sectors.
He also recommended that 90% of the people at the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) should be fired, saying they can’t be trusted to support the ZiG because they were there during the Gideon Gono and John Mangudya eras, and have repeatedly failed to deliver.
Gono served as the Governor of the RBZ from 2003 to 2013. His tenure was marked by significant economic challenges, including hyperinflation and the introduction of the Zimbabwean dollar redenomination.
Mangudya succeeded Gono and served as the Governor from 2014 to 2024 when he was succeded by the incumbent, John Mushayavanhu.
Mangudya oversaw the introduction of bond notes and the reintroduction of the Zimbabwean dollar. Wrote Mutisi:
<blockquote>
1. The Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) suffers from TOXIC INSTITUTIONAL MEMORY, that’s something needing urgent attention. More than 90% of the people working at the RBZ were there during the Gono era and the Mangudya era. These people have clearly proved to be INCAPABLE, INCOMPETENT, and MANIFESTLY CORRUPT, they can’t be trusted to save the ZiG. Governor Mushayavanhu should be allowed to select a NEW TEAM, RBZ needs that.
2. The ZiG is experiencing two things: Ever increasing supply and ever decreasing demand. This is a recipe for disaster, and that’s what policymakers should be focused on. The simple question that needs an urgent answer is: What will make a Zimbabwean citizen or business ACCEPT the ZiG and KEEP IT??? This is a very simple question but the answer to this question isn’t simple, it involves implementing DRASTIC POLICY CHANGES! It requires courageous policymakers, not the current crop of lazy policymakers who take years even to adjust interest rates. They don’t have what it takes to manage a currency, more so a currency in perpetual competition with the USD.
To slow down (ZiG) money supply growth, the RBZ should increase interest rates. The 20% interest rate introduced at the introduction of ZiG was not well thought out, it was a gamble. The interest rate should be increased.
To increase demand of the ZiG, the Ministry of Finance, Economic Development and lnvestment Promotion should take the lead. Mthuli Ncube and George Guvamatanga have been enemies of the local currency, their love for the USD is destroying the local currency. IMTT on ZiG should be removed without delay, RBZ should drastically cut bank charges and other transaction fees, businesses should pay tax in ZiG (this will force them to accept the ZiG, keep the ZiG and to look for the ZiG), and the RBZ should introduce higher denominations for the ZiG (without enough ZiG Cash, the USD will fill the gap making it the preferred currency especially in the informal sector). Without making these changes, NOTHING and NO ONE will save the ZiG. It will collapse faster than the ZWL.
3. Introduction of a FREELY FLOATING EXCHANGE RATE will cure a lot of the problems facing the Zimbabwean economy.
Currently, formal businesses HIKED USD prices… they did so because the FORMAL EXCHANGE RATE is not a MARKET DETERMINED EXCHANGE RATE… to hedge against exchange rate losses, formal businesses hiked their USD prices… that pushes customers away and it will lead to the further collapse of the formal economy. The RBZ MUST STOP dictating the exchange rate to anyone, let businesses make their own decisions. If the RBZ wants businesses to use the Official Exchange Rate, then it should ensure that the forex market is FULLY liberalised. Markets always reject COMMANDIST policies, it will NEVER work! In fact, monetary authorities in Zimbabwe should know better.
With a Floating Exchange Rate, more people will be willing to sell their forex and even fuel dealers won’t hesitate to sell fuel in ZiG.
Dr Mangudya spent 10 years trying to dictate the exchange rate to the market AND FAILED. It’s shocking that Dr Mushayavanhu, in his wisdom or lack of it, wants to follow the same approach.
4. Ultimately, the demand for a local currency has to be created BY LAW. The ZiG has no capacity to compete against WELL ESTABLISHED and WELL MANAGED currencies like the USD… it will always lose that contest. This is why smart governments COMPLETELY outlaw the use of foreign currencies for domestic transactions. This automatically creates HUGE demand for the local currency.
In Zimbabwe, the challenge is that policymakers have CONFLICT OF INTEREST. The policymakers are farming wheat (and demanding payment in USD), they own fuel companies (and DEMAND payment in USD). It’s the policymakers who HATE the local currency, ordinary citizens in Zimbabwe have CONSISTENTLY embraced the local currency.
</blockquote>
More: <a href="https://www.pindula.co.zw/">Pindula News</a>

Zimbabwe's policymakers don't like the ZiG currency because it might hurt their own businesses. They don't want to accept ZiG for fuel or wheat. Kudzai Mutisi thinks the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe needs new people because the current ones are not capable. To save the ZiG, interest rates should be increased and demand for the currency should be boosted. The exchange rate should float freely, without the RBZ dictating it. Zimbabweans need to use the local currency by law to make it strong. The problem is that policymakers have conflicts of interest because they own businesses that prefer USD over ZiG.

Opinion Latest News

Latest Jobs